https://slate.com/arts/2018/01/the-last ... -myth.html
One of the more interesting pieces on the film.
One of the more interesting pieces on the film.
Huh boy, thanks for this Armand.ArmandFancypants wrote:https://slate.com/arts/2018/01/the-last ... -myth.html
One of the more interesting pieces on the film.
They don't need to. But what's that have to do with the quality of movie it is today? It's a criticism of the movie in 2018, not the critics.BlairCo wrote:How the fuck are critics from 2009 gonna know if Avatar will hold up in 2018?Geoffrey wrote:Even if that's true, it doesn't make it hold up any better in 2018.BlairCo wrote: Credit was given where credit was due.
I'll say one thing, the title is right for this article.ArmandFancypants wrote:https://slate.com/arts/2018/01/the-last ... -myth.html
One of the more interesting pieces on the film.
Because seeing characters grapple with new contexts and scenarios is more interesting.Jarrett wrote:I understand distancing from the OT but it almost seems careless. I don't have a problem with Luke's arc but this trilogy is set on the aftermath of the OT. I know The past needs to be distanced from and the new ones need to stand on their own but if they wanted to do something completely away from that why bring anyone back from the OT?