JL Unlimited wrote: ↑

July 29th, 2023, 1:23 am

Sysmatic wrote: ↑

July 28th, 2023, 10:40 pm

dissonance wrote: ↑

July 28th, 2023, 10:31 pm

What did her story show?

Not that much actually. She had an photo of a slide of the 70mm film and a caption that the film was amazing, or something along those lines.

She called it a masterpiece.

Oh yes, you're right! That was indeed what she said. I undersold it

natalie wrote: ↑

July 29th, 2023, 10:12 am

[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F2NNpSoWoAA ... name=large[ /img]

Francis Ford Coppola has an instagram. Not at all what I expected.

Hope Damien Chazelle greatly enjoys it like Nolan greatly enjoyed First Man. I was kinda right in a comment I made in June that Oppenheimer would pick up a similar Baton that Babylon was trying to hold and has ultimately been way more successful. Basically Babylon and this movie, though thoroughly different, are 3 hour R rated star studded period piece epics released by a major studio. And they're not exactly conventional for what they are, Babylon in that it's fucking gross in parts/super Anti Hollywood and Oppenheimer in that it's also a blockbuster with many trippy psychological sequences.

Mandy's screenwriter.

natalie wrote: ↑

July 30th, 2023, 3:22 pm

Mandy's screenwriter.

Bacon wrote: ↑

July 30th, 2023, 3:41 pm

natalie wrote: ↑

July 30th, 2023, 3:22 pm

Mandy's screenwriter.

His time line is priceless.