Oppenheimer - General Information

The upcoming epic thriller based on J. Robert Oppenheimer, the enigmatic man who must risk destroying the world in order to save it.
Posts: 1439
Joined: October 2019
Ace wrote:
June 2nd, 2023, 10:21 pm
Masterpiece confirmed

Posts: 1439
Joined: October 2019

Posts: 285
Joined: March 2022
El Especial wrote:
June 3rd, 2023, 5:01 pm
We’re six weeks away from its release date, it’ll also be press screened during the last week of June — I’m there.
https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2023/6 ... rgaxg1hj93
Possible, let's take this with a grain of salt though. I feel like Variety and other major headlines spewing sites are the most official sources of confirmation.

User avatar
Posts: 3402
Joined: January 2009
I love how casually we have learned of two developments that, if officially announced a year ago, would have caused quite the sensation:

Nolan has made an R rated blockbuster
They made an IMAX film that is longer than the supposed limit of 169 minutes

Posts: 647
Joined: November 2019
El Especial wrote:
June 3rd, 2023, 4:32 pm
Ace wrote:
June 2nd, 2023, 10:21 pm
Masterpiece confirmed
Genuinely curious. Why do you think so?

Posts: 285
Joined: April 2023
DHOPW42 wrote:
June 4th, 2023, 8:24 am
I love how casually we have learned of two developments that, if officially announced a year ago, would have caused quite the sensation:

Nolan has made an R rated blockbuster
They made an IMAX film that is longer than the supposed limit of 169 minutes
I'm sure part of it is that enough people have speculated about both of these possibly being true for long enough that confirmation is less surprising than it otherwise would have been.

Posts: 285
Joined: March 2022
physicshistoryguy wrote:
June 4th, 2023, 1:17 pm
DHOPW42 wrote:
June 4th, 2023, 8:24 am
I love how casually we have learned of two developments that, if officially announced a year ago, would have caused quite the sensation:

Nolan has made an R rated blockbuster
They made an IMAX film that is longer than the supposed limit of 169 minutes
I'm sure part of it is that enough people have speculated about both of these possibly being true for long enough that confirmation is less surprising than it otherwise would have been.
Didn’t see any speculation about the R Rating, but the length yeah

Posts: 285
Joined: April 2023
Waitedalongtime wrote:
June 4th, 2023, 2:45 pm
physicshistoryguy wrote:
June 4th, 2023, 1:17 pm
DHOPW42 wrote:
June 4th, 2023, 8:24 am
I love how casually we have learned of two developments that, if officially announced a year ago, would have caused quite the sensation:

Nolan has made an R rated blockbuster
They made an IMAX film that is longer than the supposed limit of 169 minutes
I'm sure part of it is that enough people have speculated about both of these possibly being true for long enough that confirmation is less surprising than it otherwise would have been.
Didn’t see any speculation about the R Rating, but the length yeah
Hmm, I could've sworn I saw people wondering months ago whether Hiroshima/Nagasaki would be in the film and if that would warrant an R rating, but I can't remember where and it very well could be a false memory.

User avatar
Forum Pro
Posts: 242
Joined: May 2020
physicshistoryguy wrote:
June 4th, 2023, 2:54 pm
Waitedalongtime wrote:
June 4th, 2023, 2:45 pm
physicshistoryguy wrote:
June 4th, 2023, 1:17 pm


I'm sure part of it is that enough people have speculated about both of these possibly being true for long enough that confirmation is less surprising than it otherwise would have been.
Didn’t see any speculation about the R Rating, but the length yeah
Hmm, I could've sworn I saw people wondering months ago whether Hiroshima/Nagasaki would be in the film and if that would warrant an R rating, but I can't remember where and it very well could be a false memory.
Sure some people thought it’d be R, and some of those people thought it’d be R for the Hiroshima/Nagasaki stuff. I think everyone was shocked when it was rated R for the specific reasons that it was. I feel like you’d have to dig deep to even find the words nudity and sex in this forum lol

Posts: 285
Joined: April 2023
DylanHoang wrote:
June 4th, 2023, 3:08 pm
physicshistoryguy wrote:
June 4th, 2023, 2:54 pm
Waitedalongtime wrote:
June 4th, 2023, 2:45 pm


Didn’t see any speculation about the R Rating, but the length yeah
Hmm, I could've sworn I saw people wondering months ago whether Hiroshima/Nagasaki would be in the film and if that would warrant an R rating, but I can't remember where and it very well could be a false memory.
Sure some people thought it’d be R, and some of those people thought it’d be R for the Hiroshima/Nagasaki stuff. I think everyone was shocked when it was rated R for the specific reasons that it was. I feel like you’d have to dig deep to even find the words nudity and sex in this forum lol
Right, I can't remember anyone thinking that would be the case.

Post Reply