elemunt wrote:I don't understand the shtick people give Star Citizen, it's completely open development, of course it feels like its taking ages to develop.
Read the article?
And if you followed the development of SS semi-closely then you would know why people have this attitude towards this game.
They are almost 1 year behind with development.
Chances are by the end of 2017 they will be 2 years behind with development.
Instead of focusing on the promised core mechanics of the game they ventured in developing other ideas instead that were not even requested.
The game is the most expensive shit with "DLC Packs" reaching 6k figures. They call that a "backup" program for those that want to invest in it but many start to really doubt everything they say at this point. I mean there are doubts that the game will ever launch and that if it will do it will be some horrible experience, worse than NMS, which has no excuse given the budget.
I mean there are ships in the game that cost $15k that are not even made yet. They are in design stages.
The space combat is dreadful.
The FPS experience is dreadful.
The performance is dreadful.
There's only one functional system with not much to do. They say they're working on adding one more this year. That will be 2 functional systems with not much to do.
There is no end-game at this point. The game is pretty much a docking simulator. And that's what it was 3 years ago.
