you should definitely not PM it to me as that would be wrongNicewatch wrote:American Cinematographer has released the August issue featuring an amazing article on Dunkirk. They never hold back on details in that publication. I do have a digital subscription, but I don’t think it would be legal to post the PDF here.
Dunkirk's Cinematography
definitely don't PM it to me either, that would make us criminals.mchekhov 2: Chek Harder wrote:you should definitely not PM it to me as that would be wrongNicewatch wrote:American Cinematographer has released the August issue featuring an amazing article on Dunkirk. They never hold back on details in that publication. I do have a digital subscription, but I don’t think it would be legal to post the PDF here.
-Vader
mchekhov 2: Chek Harder wrote:you should definitely not PM it to me as that would be wrongNicewatch wrote:American Cinematographer has released the August issue featuring an amazing article on Dunkirk. They never hold back on details in that publication. I do have a digital subscription, but I don’t think it would be legal to post the PDF here.
Sounds like they don't want it. You can PM me though. It's a shame that you all will miss out.
Posts: 270
Joined:
July 2017
I have not sent the link to the PDF to the 4 of you above. If anyone else does not want it, please send me a PM. Thanks!
Well that sounds like a passive way of going about things. I guess you'll PM it to anyone who doesn't send you that PM, then??Nicewatch wrote:I have not sent the link to the PDF to the 4 of you above. If anyone else does not want it, please send me a PM. Thanks!
Posts: 270
Joined:
July 2017
I will not send the PDF to anyone, because that would be super evil. By PM'ing me, you confirm to me extra profoundly that you do not want me to illegally send you copyrighted material.MuffinMcFluffin wrote:Well that sounds like a passive way of going about things. I guess you'll PM it to anyone who doesn't send you that PM, then??Nicewatch wrote:I have not sent the link to the PDF to the 4 of you above. If anyone else does not want it, please send me a PM. Thanks!
^ If you're hoping that what you're saying here effusively would hold over in court while private messages show something different (and yes, stop wink-winking for a moment), I strongly implore you to reconsider that notion.
Posts: 270
Joined:
July 2017
I might be having an issue with the PMs. If you didn't get it, please PM me.
I do not want you to send me it as well.Nicewatch wrote:I have not sent the link to the PDF to the 4 of you above. If anyone else does not want it, please send me a PM. Thanks!
