Dunkirk Industry/Celebrity Buzz

The 2017 World War II thriller about the evacuation of British and Allied troops from Dunkirk beach.
Post Reply
User avatar
antovolk
Posts: 9466
Joined: December 2011
Contact:
Contact antovolk
YFR3 wrote:How can you believe a guy who wrote about the smiling extra on the first teaser :

"That "extra" in the teaser is not an extra. He was directed to respond that way for a narrative reason." (https://twitter.com/mccrabb_will/status ... 8835180544)

Fraud, definitely.
I guess we'll see what happens with the extra in the final film but in the prologue they hid him by cutting to an aerial shot of the mole
YFR3
Posts: 361
Joined: July 2016
antovolk wrote:
YFR3 wrote:How can you believe a guy who wrote about the smiling extra on the first teaser :

"That "extra" in the teaser is not an extra. He was directed to respond that way for a narrative reason." (https://twitter.com/mccrabb_will/status ... 8835180544)

Fraud, definitely.
I guess we'll see what happens with the extra in the final film but in the prologue they hid him by cutting to an aerial shot of the mole
And they deleted his smile ;)
User avatar
Willem
Posts: 2643
Joined: January 2016
Yeah lol don't forget that they CGI'd his smile out :lol:
User avatar
Sysmatic
Posts: 2572
Joined: January 2011
Contact:
Contact Sysmatic
Y'all know that every soldier has been replaced with his face in the final film. You saw the twitter header.
User avatar
Oku
Posts: 3759
Joined: May 2012
antovolk wrote:
YFR3 wrote:How can you believe a guy who wrote about the smiling extra on the first teaser :

"That "extra" in the teaser is not an extra. He was directed to respond that way for a narrative reason." (https://twitter.com/mccrabb_will/status ... 8835180544)

Fraud, definitely.
I guess we'll see what happens with the extra in the final film but in the prologue they hid him by cutting to an aerial shot of the mole
This will be one of the greatest mysteries of our time: was the aerial shot a reactionary move to hide that extra, or did Mr. Nolan always plan to have the aerial shot there?

Remember in The Dark Knight Rises trailer (that was released in December 2011), the football stadium collapse scene was one long, unbroken take.

But in the final take, it was broken up by overhead shots of the crowd.

Edit: one of the greatest, not the greatest :X
Dynamo
Posts: 11
Joined: October 2016
Los Angeles screening happening tonight. 7:30PM.
The Special One
Posts: 4193
Joined: June 2010
Dynamo wrote:Los Angeles screening happening tonight. 7:30PM.
O.....M......G
User avatar
Oku
Posts: 3759
Joined: May 2012
Dynamo wrote:Los Angeles screening happening tonight. 7:30PM.
Thank you as always, Dynamo!!

The moment of truth is coming!!
User avatar
ChristMAX
Posts: 362
Joined: May 2017
Location: Catching this Bullet
Image
User avatar
Reaveybeach
Posts: 444
Joined: August 2012
YFR3 wrote:
antovolk wrote:
YFR3 wrote:How can you believe a guy who wrote about the smiling extra on the first teaser :

"That "extra" in the teaser is not an extra. He was directed to respond that way for a narrative reason." (https://twitter.com/mccrabb_will/status ... 8835180544)

Fraud, definitely.
I guess we'll see what happens with the extra in the final film but in the prologue they hid him by cutting to an aerial shot of the mole
And they deleted his smile ;)
I also don't really get his reasoning with the extra not being one because he was "directed" for a "narrative reason," dafuq does that even mean? You stop being an extra when you have *lines.*
Post Reply

Return to “Dunkirk”