Well, your avatar is an all time reminder of that extra. Changing it might help.genloovers wrote:Anyone else find that extra to be totally distracting? I can't take my eye off him every time I watch the prologue.
IMAX Prologue
That extra's face doesn't even seem to show in the trailer.
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 74766.html
And you don't see him smile in the prologue.
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-enter ... 74766.html
And you don't see him smile in the prologue.
Last edited by dormouse7 on December 28th, 2016, 11:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 11
Joined:
December 2016
its because of your avatar, brogenloovers wrote:Anyone else find that extra to be totally distracting? I can't take my eye off him every time I watch the prologue.
I hope they edit it out, too, or at least use an alternate take.Rubow89 wrote:Yes I can't believe they're still using that shot. Hopefully it's edited for the final filmgenloovers wrote:Anyone else find that extra to be totally distracting? I can't take my eye off him every time I watch the prologue.
As soon as the shot came in I got curious instantly if they used another shot. They pretty much cut him by using a cutaway, so I think a lot of you are nitpicking! Maybe they can trim half a sec after the cutaway to satisfy everyone. That cutaway gave me a "nerd chill" so they better keep that!Havoc1st wrote:Not me. Completely forgot about him while watching the prologue.genloovers wrote:Anyone else find that extra to be totally distracting? I can't take my eye off him every time I watch the prologue.
First of all, they used a really smart cut to hide the face. Second, they changed his face with CGI. Third of all, there were so many intense things happening during the prologue that my brain couldn't even think of this guy's mile. If it still bothers you, you're just purposely paying attention to it.
Please stop crying about the face.
Please stop crying about the face.
Nolan accidentally "inceptionized" them!willaartwillem wrote:First of all, they used a really smart cut to hide the face. Second, they changed his face with CGI. Third of all, there were so many intense things happening during the prologue that my brain couldn't even think of this guy's mile. If it still bothers you, you're just purposely paying attention to it.
Please stop crying about the face.
Posts: 4193
Joined:
June 2010
Rightwillaartwillem wrote:First of all, they used a really smart cut to hide the face. Second, they changed his face with CGI. Third of all, there were so many intense things happening during the prologue that my brain couldn't even think of this guy's mile. If it still bothers you, you're just purposely paying attention to it.
Please stop crying about the face.
willaartwillem wrote:First of all, they used a really smart cut to hide the face. Second, they changed his face with CGI. Third of all, there were so many intense things happening during the prologue that my brain couldn't even think of this guy's mile. If it still bothers you, you're just purposely paying attention to it.
Please stop crying about the face.
They didn't use a cut to hide his face. That aerial shot would have been used anyway o show the POV of the incoming plane. It's not his face that's worrying; now, it's his awkward look around stutter before ducking that's distracting.willaartwillem wrote:First of all, they used a really smart cut to hide the face. Second, they changed his face with CGI. Third of all, there were so many intense things happening during the prologue that my brain couldn't even think of this guy's mile. If it still bothers you, you're just purposely paying attention to it.
Please stop crying about the face.
