I don't think directors are dumb enough to hire actors because of their potential years from now, they do it because they think the actor/actress is good enough for their current project.
Joseph Gordon-Levitt as John Blake
Posts: 246
Joined:
April 2011
Posts: 220
Joined:
April 2011
lol just forget it...abcd786 wrote:I don't think directors are dumb enough to hire actors because of their potential years from now, they do it because they think the actor/actress is good enough for their current project.
This is interesting. Bruce, Bane and now Blake being orphans.loop wrote:Lynn wrote:That's interesting! Do you have a link to the post on SHH?
Blake being a redeemable orphan character sounds a little similar to... uh, Robin, no?
Thanks a lot!loop wrote:Lynn wrote:That's interesting! Do you have a link to the post on SHH?
Lynn wrote:Thanks a lot!
I think it's safe to say that with Miranda being seen with Gordon... and Blake holding that petrol can near an orphanage... we've completely lost the trail of this film.
Well done, Nolan. You didn't need to hide anything from us, because we still don't have a clue what you're doing.
Well done, Nolan. You didn't need to hide anything from us, because we still don't have a clue what you're doing.
loop wrote:Lynn wrote:Thanks a lot!
Posts: 219
Joined:
June 2011
Lyn please kill me. thanks.
Well, I certainly don't remember seeing anything other than speculation. And that seems to be a scene I'd remember.Lynn wrote:loop wrote:thedisabledcubicle is right. I, for one, am completely lost.
Posts: 6803
Joined:
May 2011
And I wouldn't have it any other way.thedisabledcubicle wrote:I think it's safe to say that with Miranda being seen with Gordon... and Blake holding that petrol can near an orphanage... we've completely lost the trail of this film.
Well done, Nolan. You didn't need to hide anything from us, because we still don't have a clue what you're doing.