Bale was playing the character that was at the center of the trilogy and he did an amazing job at it.gaspernoe wrote:George Clooney is a good actor but let's face it, everyone was terrible in that movie and all down to Joel Schumacher. Sometimes bad directors can make even the best of actors look terrible. Just look at This Means War with Tom Hardy.nolangoatdirector wrote: Yeah, because George Clooney was terrific.
With regards to Nolan's Batman any solid actor could've played him. Christian Bale who's very good didn't have to break a sweat playing him. Even if you replace Bale with any average actor, Nolan's movies wouldn't have decreased in quality one bit. The villains, the beautiful cinematography, the story, set pieces and of course direction make these movies what they are.
Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne/Batman
Haha, very funny.RyanRises wrote:Bruce Wayne? He saved an entire city multiple times.BatMan528491 wrote:
Can't stand that asshole
gaspernoe wrote:
With regards to Nolan's Batman any solid actor could've played him. Christian Bale who's very good didn't have to break a sweat playing him. Even if you replace Bale with any average actor, Nolan's movies wouldn't have decreased in quality one bit. The villains, the beautiful cinematography, the story, set pieces and of course direction make these movies what they are.
1) Agree 100%. WTF gasper?banepants wrote:gaspernoe wrote:
With regards to Nolan's Batman any solid actor could've played him. Christian Bale who's very good didn't have to break a sweat playing him. Even if you replace Bale with any average actor, Nolan's movies wouldn't have decreased in quality one bit. The villains, the beautiful cinematography, the story, set pieces and of course direction make these movies what they are.
2) You used a Sherlock GIF
You get {+4} on the Braked Scale
Sigs???
You are seriously underestimating what Bale brought to the table just because he has a more quiet performance compared to the villains. If you put a less capable actor in his role and put him against Ledger's Joker, it would be a disaster.gaspernoe wrote:George Clooney is a good actor but let's face it, everyone was terrible in that movie and all down to Joel Schumacher. Sometimes bad directors can make even the best of actors look terrible. Just look at This Means War with Tom Hardy.nolangoatdirector wrote: Yeah, because George Clooney was terrific.
With regards to Nolan's Batman any solid actor could've played him. Christian Bale who's very good didn't have to break a sweat playing him. Even if you replace Bale with any average actor, Nolan's movies wouldn't have decreased in quality one bit. The villains, the beautiful cinematography, the story, set pieces and of course direction make these movies what they are.
Posts: 459
Joined:
November 2012
Care to elaborate on this "Braked Scale" and how good a +4 is?TehBatGetsBraked wrote:1) Agree 100%. WTF gasper?banepants wrote:
2) You used a Sherlock GIF
You get {+4} on the Braked Scale
The Braked Scale - The most objective and accurate way to rate human brings ever inventednolangoatdirector wrote:Care to elaborate on this "Braked Scale" and how good a +4 is?TehBatGetsBraked wrote:
1) Agree 100%. WTF gasper?
2) You used a Sherlock GIF
You get {+4} on the Braked Scale
+1- I agree
+2- Well put
+3- ur smart
+4- ur sexy
+5...etc etc.
Sigs???
Posts: 459
Joined:
November 2012
Oh ok. Thanks!TehBatGetsBraked wrote: The Braked Scale - The most objective and accurate way to rate human brings ever invented
+1- I agree
+2- Well put
+3- ur smart
+4- ur sexy
+5...etc etc.
SomeFrenchToast wrote:Is it me or Batman is deviating a laser shot with his crotch in your sig?Bacon wrote:I feel he had his chance and he nailed it! I can't imagine him playing the character without Nolan.
That's exactly what I was thinking.
And I didn't care much for his Rage-Man but you couldn't replace Bale's Wayne, that was perfect.
Do you... like pineapple?
Posts: 28
Joined:
January 2013