Inception Review Discussion (240 total)
Posts: 148
Joined:
July 2010
Posts: 148
Joined:
July 2010
George Can you BOLD the reviews that will appear on RT?
Posts: 148
Joined:
July 2010
already posted
Where?hasanbilal80 wrote:already posted
nice to see a positive ny critic..
Posts: 148
Joined:
July 2010
a few pages back. Georgie Boy here hasnt added it on the listapw wrote:Where?hasanbilal80 wrote:already posted
Posts: 29
Joined:
July 2010
Exactly. I think "too confusing, impossible to understand, etc..." are valid reasons and can be seen as flaws, but only if the reviewer paid enough attention. If a critic completely lost it for like half an hour or more, he/she needs to see the movie again before assessing it, but if the critic gave the movie his full attention and the movie failed to make sense to him/her in various spots, it's his right to take off stars from its rating.redfirebird2008 wrote:I don't know about valid reasons. What's valid to one person isn't valid to another.Greenleaf wrote:
but atleast he wont give silly reasons for not giving it 4 stars (like its confusing , couldnt understand) ..... he gives some valid reasons............
It wasn't. I searched. That was a blog post from the NY Post. This is official review.hasanbilal80 wrote:
a few pages back. Georgie Boy here hasnt added it on the list
Posts: 29
Joined:
July 2010
Where is the 1/5 rating? There's nothing here http://www.nypress.com/article-21420-de ... ption.htmlOneironaut wrote:1 out of 5 stars.Jesus of Suburbia wrote:what did Armond White give inception?