Starting this thread for the sole sake of thanking Wally Pfister for refusing to shoot films in 3D or with digital cameras.
THANK YOU!!!
THANK YOU!!!
What's wrong with digital cameras?MW715 wrote:Starting this thread for the sole sake of thanking Wally Pfister for refusing to shoot films in 3D or with digital cameras.
THANK YOU!!!
MW715 wrote:Starting this thread for the sole sake of thanking Wally Pfister for refusing to shoot films in 3D or with digital cameras.
THANK YOU!!!
I think digitally shot films look like crap. They either look like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries in my opinion. Sure film's expensive and a pain to work with, but it adds such atmosphere to the frame and looks so much better (in my opinion)Vader182 wrote: What's wrong with digital cameras?
-Vader
You think The Social Network looks like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries?MW715 wrote:I think digitally shot films look like crap. They either look like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries in my opinion. Sure film's expensive and a pain to work with, but it adds such atmosphere to the frame and looks so much better (in my opinion)Vader182 wrote: What's wrong with digital cameras?
-Vader
...I hated that movie... so don't get me started...Vader182 wrote:You think The Social Network looks like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries?MW715 wrote: I think digitally shot films look like crap. They either look like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries in my opinion. Sure film's expensive and a pain to work with, but it adds such atmosphere to the frame and looks so much better (in my opinion)
Right.
-Vader