allstarr55js wrote:Mulligan would be good.

dear god

dear god

or Melissa Leo if younger.

Marion Cotillard. :modesty:

chee wrote:Marion Cotillard. :modesty:

that could work, but she doesnt seem like the type to go for that

RomanM wrote:I love the Wilde, fanboys would hate it though because she isn't packing the ummm hardware attachment(s)

I wouldn't complain if she got a little "hardware upgrade".

Oh you're horrible Mr. O'Brien... horrible.

Wilde - fit for the role...
Gemma - I guess she would be OK with 10 tons of make-up..

how about...

Megan Fox (honestly... in all the theaters will be some sort of inadequate behavior consisting of self-touching, touching of your partner, touching the Johnson(s)... over the jeans/under the jeans... or a particular showing of one continuous extremely sedated quirky smile on fat people's face)

RIFA wrote:Wilde - fit for the role...
Gemma - I guess she would be OK with 10 tons of make-up..

how about...

Megan Fox (honestly... in all the theaters will be some sort of inadequate behavior consisting of self-touching, touching of your partner, touching the Johnson(s)... over the jeans/under the jeans... or a particular showing of one continuous extremely sedated quirky smile on fat people's face)

I thought Megan Fox has refused to play the role.£

RIFA wrote:Wilde - fit for the role...
Gemma - I guess she would be OK with 10 tons of make-up..

how about...

Megan Fox (honestly... in all the theaters will be some sort of inadequate behavior consisting of self-touching, touching of your partner, touching the Johnson(s)... over the jeans/under the jeans... or a particular showing of one continuous extremely sedated quirky smile on fat people's face)

Why would she need tons of makeup? Gemma looks more like modern day Lara than Wilde.

RomanM wrote:Why would she need tons of makeup? Gemma looks more like modern day Lara than Wilde.

Because she looks like this...