Not even remotely what anyone is saying, but I think you already know that
1917 (2019)
Definitely gives me a Dunkirk vibe, obvious where he got the inspiration from. Not saying it's gonna be bad, looks good
If you were reading my posts, you'd see I was actually expressing my concern about a film I haven't seen being too similar to a film I have seen. That's different than slamming the film itself. If I was slamming anything it was mainstream audiences criticizing a film I have seen.
The possibility of some preferring this to Dunkirk. The horror.Bacon wrote: ↑August 1st, 2019, 3:11 pmIf you were reading my posts, you'd see I was actually expressing my concern about a film I haven't seen being too similar to a film I have seen. That's different than slamming the film itself. If I was slamming anything it was mainstream audiences criticizing a film I have seen.
Generalizing points the way you're continuing to do is a good way to get no one to take you seriously. But you do you.Allstar wrote: ↑August 1st, 2019, 3:16 pmThe possibility of some preferring this to Dunkirk. The horror.Bacon wrote: ↑August 1st, 2019, 3:11 pmIf you were reading my posts, you'd see I was actually expressing my concern about a film I haven't seen being too similar to a film I have seen. That's different than slamming the film itself. If I was slamming anything it was mainstream audiences criticizing a film I have seen.
Can y'all kiss and makeup pls. smh
Btw, nothing wrong with including an additional emotional thrust for one of the characters. Often times that can add a lot.anarchy wrote: ↑August 1st, 2019, 2:10 pmThe protagonist has a brother. A brother! Way more "human" and "relatable".
Haven't seen the film so really shouldn't be judging but the brother thing already feels like a cheap ploy to squeeze emotion out of audiences. Other than that, it looks good. Excited to see Deakins doing the long take thing.
Posts: 55632
Joined:
May 2010
This looks great.
