The Post: The Thread

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
Post Reply
User avatar
Master Virgo
Posts: 13506
Joined: February 2011
Image



£
User avatar
Pioneerr
Posts: 634
Joined: June 2017
Location: Holland
Nomis wrote:Besides, do they work with a 4K DI, 2K or do they do it photochemically? IMDb says 4K DI but that's not exactly a really reliable source.
Does it really matter?
User avatar
Allstar
Posts: 43129
Joined: May 2010
MeLVaNoaTe wrote:
:sick:

Streep looks like a gigantic ham.
User avatar
Nomis
Posts: 19209
Joined: June 2012
Location: stuck in 2020
Pioneerr wrote:
Nomis wrote:Besides, do they work with a 4K DI, 2K or do they do it photochemically? IMDb says 4K DI but that's not exactly a really reliable source.
Does it really matter?
Of course it does. It's about how they 'rework' what they have shot. No wonder Nolan's films look so incredible because photochemically finishing the film preserves the most quality of the film. Finishing a film in 2K is basically working on a lower resolution than film is. Yeah I know you can't really compare film with pixels only sorta, but you get what I mean.
User avatar
DoubleD
Posts: 17534
Joined: May 2011
Definitely reeks of Oscar, but that's not really a bad thing is it. It'll be a decent, interesting film I'm sure.
Nomis wrote:
Pioneerr wrote:
Nomis wrote:Besides, do they work with a 4K DI, 2K or do they do it photochemically? IMDb says 4K DI but that's not exactly a really reliable source.
Does it really matter?
Of course it does. It's about how they 'rework' what they have shot. No wonder Nolan's films look so incredible because photochemically finishing the film preserves the most quality of the film. Finishing a film in 2K is basically working on a lower resolution than film is. Yeah I know you can't really compare film with pixels only sorta, but you get what I mean.
gravity and force awakens were 2k
shauner111
Posts: 3728
Joined: June 2011
ACTING.
User avatar
Nomis
Posts: 19209
Joined: June 2012
Location: stuck in 2020
mchekhov 2: Chek Harder wrote:
Nomis wrote:
Pioneerr wrote:
Does it really matter?
Of course it does. It's about how they 'rework' what they have shot. No wonder Nolan's films look so incredible because photochemically finishing the film preserves the most quality of the film. Finishing a film in 2K is basically working on a lower resolution than film is. Yeah I know you can't really compare film with pixels only sorta, but you get what I mean.
gravity and force awakens were 2k
Tbh, it shows.
User avatar
FuturePast
Posts: 5219
Joined: January 2012
Allstar wrote:
MeLVaNoaTe wrote:
:sick:

Streep looks like a gigantic ham.
Interesting, I thought she was quite subtle...her hamming it up was worrying me.

Hanks sounds weird though.
User avatar
Crazy Eight
Posts: 13944
Joined: June 2009
Location: La La Land
Nomis wrote: Tbh, it shows.
you're adorable
Post Reply

Return to “Movies & TV”