MyCocaine wrote:

LelekPL wrote:DDL and PTA sound great but fashion? Not really a topic that makes me interested.

Anything PTA decides to make should make you exited.

Throw Day-Lewis into the mix and it should make you squeal.

Not after Inherent Vice

Give me this movie now

Dodd wrote:DDL? Fashion? PTA?


INNNNNNNNNNNNN


I love fashion flicks

This is probably going to be a criticism of the fashion industry.

LelekPL wrote:

MyCocaine wrote:Anything PTA decides to make should make you exited.

Throw Day-Lewis into the mix and it should make you squeal.

Not after Inherent Vice

I was once like you. I went out of the cinema feeling disappointed and confused. I thought the film was pointless. But as PTA has shown us with his last two films, repeated viewings of his work are mandatory. Step into the light. Inherent Vice is an impeccable work of art.

hey prince post in this thread

Allstar wrote:

Dodd wrote:DDL? Fashion? PTA?


INNNNNNNNNNNNN


I love fashion flicks

This is probably going to be a criticism of the fashion industry.

it IS interesting that this is his setting of choice after his last two films involved cults. given, they weren't the focus of either film

MyCocaine wrote:

LelekPL wrote:

MyCocaine wrote:Anything PTA decides to make should make you exited.

Throw Day-Lewis into the mix and it should make you squeal.

Not after Inherent Vice

I was once like you. I went out of the cinema feeling disappointed and confused. I thought the film was pointless. But as PTA has shown us with his last two films, repeated viewings of his work are mandatory. Step into the light. Inherent Vice is an impeccable work of art.

I mean you chose to say it in the most condescending way possible but I guess I agree.

mchekhov 2: Chek Harder wrote: it IS interesting that this is his setting of choice after his last two films involved cults. given, they weren't the focus of either film

This is what's so great about PTA's filmogrophy, we know next to nothing about the movie yet we can use his past films to try to get an early understanding of this one.

MyCocaine wrote:

LelekPL wrote:

MyCocaine wrote:Anything PTA decides to make should make you exited.

Throw Day-Lewis into the mix and it should make you squeal.

Not after Inherent Vice

I was once like you. I went out of the cinema feeling disappointed and confused. I thought the film was pointless. But as PTA has shown us with his last two films, repeated viewings of his work are mandatory. Step into the light. Inherent Vice is an impeccable work of art.

Maybe it is a work of art... but it wasn't enjoyable in the least* so no repeat viewing for me.

*Maybe except for this scene
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eueFItCd2ng

Inherent Vice is his best movie. I think the argument can be made that he gets better with each film.

Megan Ellison retweeted this

Peter Sciretta ‏@slashfilm 3 jun.
Break Out the Celebratory Milkshakes: Paul Thomas Anderson and Daniel Day-Lewis May ... http://bit.ly/25Bqngs