Mission: Impossible - Fallout (2018)

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
User avatar
Posts: 9466
Joined: December 2011
Nomis wrote:For writing or directing?
probably both

Posts: 55632
Joined: May 2010
Probably both, and that's a formula shake-up as well.

User avatar
Posts: 19209
Joined: June 2012
Location: stuck in 2020
I would be happy with that!

Now Patton and Ferguson need to accept 8-)

Posts: 55632
Joined: May 2010
Nomis wrote:I would be happy with that!

Now Patton and Ferguson need to accept 8-)
Nah just Ferguson imo, there was actual chemistry with Cruise plus two chicks aren't really needed.

User avatar
Posts: 13944
Joined: June 2009
Location: La La Land
m4st4 wrote:
Nomis wrote:I would be happy with that!

Now Patton and Ferguson need to accept 8-)
Nah just Ferguson imo, there was actual chemistry with Cruise plus two chicks aren't really needed.
Image

User avatar
Posts: 19209
Joined: June 2012
Location: stuck in 2020
lol m4 wtf.

Posts: 55632
Joined: May 2010
Ha-ha. Not sure how you guys saw that but it's called balance: you got Cruise, techie (Rhames), suit (Renner), geek (Pegg) and a cool spy girl (Ferguson), up yours.

User avatar
Posts: 17534
Joined: May 2011
m4st4 wrote:plus two chicks aren't really needed.
You're right.

Three would be better.

Monaghan needs to return.

Posts: 55632
Joined: May 2010
DoubleD wrote:
m4st4 wrote:plus two chicks aren't really needed.
You're right.

Three would be better.

Monaghan needs to return.
Image

User avatar
Posts: 13944
Joined: June 2009
Location: La La Land
m4st4 wrote:Ha-ha. Not sure how you guys saw that but it's called balance: you got Cruise, techie (Rhames), suit (Renner), geek (Pegg) and a cool spy girl (Ferguson), up yours.
Four guys and one girl... balance.

Post Reply