Eh, first one was better than IM2. The villain in the sequel was even more rushed and bland and anti-climatic than the villain in IM1.

chee wrote:
It's only $5 million off. It would be embarassing if it was $20 million off.

The last time a movie was over-estimated by so much was Attack of the Clones. It's pretty rare for a studio to be so wrong.

I do agree on the villain. In the first IM he was better set up and developing as the movie went along.

movieman1005 wrote:I do agree on the villain. In the first IM he was better set up and developing as the movie went along.

Yeah, Mickey Rourke kinda underused for me.

Plus, he was the type of villain that needed a developed back story. His back story was rushed.

Whiplash isn't no Joker who can just waltz in to cause anarchy.