The Wolverine (2013)

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
User avatar
Posts: 20369
Joined: June 2010
cooldued wrote:even if this film sucks (i highly doubt it) it will still make more than 900 million worldwide.
Just like Jim Cameron's films.

User avatar
Posts: 13003
Joined: February 2011
cchriswake wrote:you're basing that on pretty much nothing

was Nolan restrained in TDK? Nolan and Bale both stated during the press junkets of Begins' how grateful they were to Warner Bros for "backing them up on their endeavors 100%" and "trusting Chris". It's unlikely they yank that power back the third movie in unless this is Sony (Spider-man 3)... or Fox (X-3)
everybody knows about how Warner gave so much freedom to Nolan on his Batman franchise but they obviously wouldn't have let Nolan to do whatever he would want to do. the thing is he just didn't do anything to concern them. he knew how much he could push the limits and he didn't go further than that. what I think is making big budget movies by great directors like Nolan and Aronofsky is a waste of talent. they would do a great job, no doubt about that, but the truth is both Aronofsky and Nolan are more than that. why we should see only 75% when we can see 95% of them in a movie. 75% surely is more than enough to make a great movie, but a guy like me would always regret that why Aronofsky can't bring his own 100% imagination to the big screen with that money and time. I loved both two Nolan batman films they are in my top 25 favorite of the decade but I still prefer to see more movies like Inception. that's all.£
Last edited by Master Virgo on March 17th, 2011, 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Posts: 3508
Joined: May 2010
IWatchFilmsNotMovies wrote:
cooldued wrote:even if this film sucks (i highly doubt it) it will still make more than 900 million worldwide.
Just like Jim Cameron's films.
:facepalm:

User avatar
Posts: 20369
Joined: June 2010
Just kidding I'm a huge fan.

User avatar
Posts: 3508
Joined: May 2010
IWatchFilmsNotMovies wrote:Just kidding I'm a huge fan.
Better be or cameron will stop paying me....... :twothumbsup:

Posts: 2001
Joined: November 2009
Location: Wisconsin, USA
I thought that although this seemed to be a slightly odd choice, it would have been very interesting to see his take. All I've got to say is I pray they choose someone decent.

And I think this project may have been good to Aronofsky cause it could give him a wider audience and have his name be more well known. Could also have given more attention to his other and future films.

User avatar
Posts: 3772
Joined: August 2009
Location: a galaxy far far away
mastervirgo wrote:
cchriswake wrote:you're basing that on pretty much nothing

was Nolan restrained in TDK? Nolan and Bale both stated during the press junkets of Begins' how grateful they were to Warner Bros for "backing them up on their endeavors 100%" and "trusting Chris". It's unlikely they yank that power back the third movie in unless this is Sony (Spider-man 3)... or Fox (X-3)
everybody knows about how Warner gave so much freedom to Nolan on his Batman franchise but they obviously wouldn't have let Nolan to do whatever he would want to do. the thing is he just didn't do anything to concern them. he knew how much he could push the limits and he didn't go further than that. what I think is making big budget movies by great directors like Nolan and Aronofsky is a waste of talent. they would do a great job, no doubt about that, but the truth is both Aronofsky and Nolan are more than that. why we should see only 75% when we can see 95% of them in a movie. 75% surely is more than enough to make a great movie, but a guy like me would always regret that why Aronofsky can't bring his own 100% imagination to the big screen with that money and time. I loved both two Nolan batman films they are in my top 25 favorite of the decade but I still prefer to see more movies like Inception. that's all.£
Isn't it Inception a big budget film? :think:

Posts: 15900
Joined: June 2009
they should put Tarantino or Gibson on it

User avatar
Posts: 42766
Joined: May 2010
talli wrote:they should put Tarantino or Gibson on it
:facepalm: Tarantino would never even consider it.

User avatar
Posts: 20369
Joined: June 2010
talli wrote:they should put Tarantino or Gibson on it
I agree would love Tarantino to do it.

Post Reply