Original vs. Remake

This 2002 remake of a Norwegian film follows a Los Angeles homicide detective dispatched to Alaska to investigate the murder of a local teen.
Posts: 18329
Joined: February 2011
Well, one thing I'm sure of, is that Nolan's remake is far superior to the original. In my opinion.

User avatar
Posts: 17502
Joined: May 2011
Haven't seen the original, but it must be awesome if Nolan decided to make it one of his own.
"It doesn't matter how you get knocked down in life because that's going to happen. All that matters is you gotta get up."

User avatar
Posts: 2777
Joined: December 2011
Location: Brasil
Erik wrote:I have to say that the whole style of the orignal version is better then Nolan's version. The story sounds more realistic in Norway then in Alaska. Besides that, I thought that Nolan's version was a bit too long and at some points a little boring. This movie is more up-tempo (a little shorter too) and does not get boring, not a moment.
I haven't watched the original yet (it's in my 2012 to do list) and I'm sure it must be very good (why else would Nolan be involved?), but I find it hard to believe that it's better than Nolan's. I do not think Nolan's version is long or boring at any time. The pace of the film matches Dormer state of mind and tries to share it with the audience. That's what I like the most about Nolan's style. We share Lenny's disorientation in Memento, Dormer's drowsiness in Insomnia, Angier's and Borden's puzzlement in The Prestige and Cobb's dream-like "reality" in Inception. We don't watch Nolan's films, we experience it.

Posts: 6
Joined: September 2012
The Scandinavian in me says original, while the cinema fan in me says remake.

User avatar
Posts: 8049
Joined: October 2011
Location: Chungking Mansions
Original is better.
Do you... like pineapple?

User avatar
Forum Pro
Posts: 55228
Joined: May 2010
Location: Jackson County
Never seen the original and don't care.
    "Just a girl. Not a threat."

    Post Reply