Glad the reviews are better than expected
"Oppenheimer" Reviews Discussion
Yeah I'm confused on why the EW review isn't showing yet.MaxContract wrote: ↑July 20th, 2023, 11:28 amWe’re still waiting for that 100 from EW to get in. I think Wall Street Journals review was very glowing as well.
With that said, I know Richard Brody will eventually review this for the New Yorker and he is most likely not going to give it a good score. So 89 is probably where it will stay
Has Brody given Nolan not glowing reviews in the past. I'm not familiar with his reviews. I also looked on metacritic and he only has 1 review out there from 2014 unless I'm missing something.
Stop quoting him so he doesn't appear to everyone who blocked him.
Let him post in a vacuum.
Let him post in a vacuum.
Then as soon as I say that they post the EW review and it's back to 90 on MC.
Posts: 1
Joined:
July 2023
Just saw it a couple of minutes ago in Portugal must say glad to see Nolan embracing some dark and heavy themes with the same as willingness to take risks and the importance of the experience on the big screen now the following the days its all about thinking about the picture and waiting for the amazing soundtrack and next week or so going for a second time to the big screen and see it again .
Posts: 255
Joined:
August 2020
Hmm perhaps his reviews don’t always get counted on metacritic but he writes for the New Yorker. He has never liked a Nolan movie and I don’t expect that to change with this one.bootsy wrote: ↑July 20th, 2023, 11:50 amYeah I'm confused on why the EW review isn't showing yet.MaxContract wrote: ↑July 20th, 2023, 11:28 amWe’re still waiting for that 100 from EW to get in. I think Wall Street Journals review was very glowing as well.
With that said, I know Richard Brody will eventually review this for the New Yorker and he is most likely not going to give it a good score. So 89 is probably where it will stay
Has Brody given Nolan not glowing reviews in the past. I'm not familiar with his reviews. I also looked on metacritic and he only has 1 review out there from 2014 unless I'm missing something.
Back to 90.MaxContract wrote: ↑July 20th, 2023, 11:28 amWe’re still waiting for that 100 from EW to get in. I think Wall Street Journals review was very glowing as well.
With that said, I know Richard Brody will eventually review this for the New Yorker and he is most likely not going to give it a good score. So 89 is probably where it will stay
Don't know what's coming up, and if this can go down from here?
Posts: 4794
Joined:
January 2012
Can't wait for Mark Kermode's review.
Posts: 255
Joined:
August 2020
WSJ will get in there and that was a rave so hopefully another 100.poplar wrote: ↑July 20th, 2023, 12:04 pmBack to 90.MaxContract wrote: ↑July 20th, 2023, 11:28 amWe’re still waiting for that 100 from EW to get in. I think Wall Street Journals review was very glowing as well.
With that said, I know Richard Brody will eventually review this for the New Yorker and he is most likely not going to give it a good score. So 89 is probably where it will stay
Don't know what's coming up, and if this can go down from here?
I can see Kermode or even Film Threat get in also. Anthony Lane reviewed Oppenheimer for the New Yorker and that seemed to be pretty praise worthy as well. Brody will likely slam Oppenheimer or give it a mixed review and he may get on metacritic also. Still a way to go
