Ruth wrote: ↑

September 30th, 2019, 12:18 pm

time might absolutely be the enemy for this since it comes out 2 years after dunkirkino

"Pressed"

Bacon wrote: ↑

October 1st, 2019, 10:55 pm

Ruth wrote: ↑

September 30th, 2019, 12:18 pm

time might absolutely be the enemy for this since it comes out 2 years after dunkirkino

"Pressed"

Ruth wrote: ↑

October 2nd, 2019, 12:29 am

Bacon wrote: ↑

October 1st, 2019, 10:55 pm

Ruth wrote: ↑

September 30th, 2019, 12:18 pm

time might absolutely be the enemy for this since it comes out 2 years after dunkirkino

"Pressed"

LmAo! SaVaGe RuTH.

Vader182 wrote: ↑

September 30th, 2019, 12:37 pm

buddy we've known for more than 5 or 6 months lol

this BTS thing got me way more interested in 1917 than the trailer did tbh


-Vader

Yup.

I think the one-take thing will likely transcend gimmick, since the whole point of what they're undertaking is territory. To get that sense of continuity, if done well, will be a unique experience.

Ruth wrote: ↑

October 2nd, 2019, 12:29 am

Bacon wrote: ↑

October 1st, 2019, 10:55 pm

Ruth wrote: ↑

September 30th, 2019, 12:18 pm

time might absolutely be the enemy for this since it comes out 2 years after dunkirkino

"Pressed"

I don't think it did lol

1.) that song choice is terrrrrible
2.) why wouldn't they show a single instance of the long-take-y-ness?


-Vader

What a colossal failure of a trailer. Ima pass this in theaters and just watch Dunkirk on my 4K w/surround

I mean, it certainly distanced itself from the Dunkirk-esque ticking clock trailer that the first one used lol

Feels like they're trying to be like that first trailer for Dunkirk instead of the "race against time" angle. I have no doubt this movie is going to be shot gorgeously and directed incredibly, but this trailer did not do it any favours. Showcase those fucking long ass takes!