Nolan Fans

Vader182 wrote: ↑

May 28th, 2020, 2:32 pm

I mean... he's not wrong. On some level, there are no two objects exactly, precisely the same unless you get into the subatomic level.

Nolan says a lot of nonsense when it comes to color science and so on, but I don't think this is a particularly controversial point?


-Vader

I for one think what he says about color science is true, when he talks about film vs digital i mean, film has no banding of the colors, is the full spectrum, digital is another story, we just began delivering content in HDR, wich is still inferior to the film color spectrum, we are going to have to wait until we get 16 bit hdr displays for it to be on par with film, so in that sense, Chris is absolutely right.

dragon_phoenix wrote: ↑

May 28th, 2020, 2:26 pm

Paradoxicalparabola wrote: ↑

May 28th, 2020, 10:47 am

Ace wrote: ↑

May 28th, 2020, 10:30 am

What is this from?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sfweek ... ummer/amp/

It seems like Nolan is not a great science and math student, lol.

At first glance it’s kind of odd what he said considering there are explanations for it scientifically and mathematically speaking although I don’t believe Nolan doesn’t use internet for research to find out why because I remember he once said it’s a great tool for that, so I think he may have meant it in a more philosophical or abstract way perhaps.

According to the article at one point, before his paradox comment, he says “I am fascinated by our subjective perception of reality, that we are all stuck in a very singular point of view, a singular perspective on what we all agree to be an objective reality”. Later on, the interviewer says "Watching Inception, I tell Nolan, I made a note that the movie — really, his entire filmography thus far — is for people who regard “2 + 2 = 4” not as an inviolable absolute, but rather as a manmade construct subject to multiple variations and interpretations." And in the twitter picture Nolan then starts talking about what we can observe in the case of 2+2=4 and that we know it’s true because of that. But in a more subjective perspective then things can start becoming weirder to the point where it might lead to paradoxes which is what I gather from what he said about his kids.

Cool images, any why to enlarge the text?

intersteIIarx wrote: ↑

May 29th, 2020, 11:04 am

Scans from TotalFilm magazine’s Tenet exclusive

Thank you.

So finally Emma Thomas says Tenet is not a sequel to Inception or story wise related to it. It’s its own thing. Guess some people now will move on from that idea.

Guys... No discussion/comments in the Updates Thread...

Reacting to the TotalFilm article - I'll put it in spoilers for those who don't want to read anything about the film:

bdw, when are we supposed to get a new poster ?

666kalpa wrote: ↑

May 29th, 2020, 3:03 pm

bdw, when are we supposed to get a new poster ?

I might be wrong, but I suppose the new poster really needs the exact release date, so... not until that is settled, I'd guess.