Also it’s important to note that Nolan takes longer to shoot than typical for the given size of the movie. Four months seems about right for a Dunkirk-sized movie.
TENET - General Information
^ There he goes again.
Interstellar shooting began in August and finished in November.Mr. Alley wrote: ↑April 8th, 2019, 3:18 pmInteresting! If June to September is true that would make this a quite short shooting period. For comparison: Inception and Interstellar both were shot from June to December. Would be similar to Dunkirk (May to August).Nolan62 wrote: ↑April 8th, 2019, 2:53 pmNothing really new, in fact just a little information, but we're so close now, more informations are coming little by little
https://hnentertainment.co/christopher- ... september/
https://twitter.com/GeekVibesNews/statu ... 4402992128
Doesn't quite match to the more than epic descriptions we're getting.
I think we'll get something nobody expects - just like Dunkirk
Last edited by Collins on April 8th, 2019, 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Considering Inception and Interstellar were also around four months, it's safe to compare this film as the same size as those two as well - not just Dunkirk. This new one is most likely bigger than Dunkirk.
I'd guess the budget at between $120 million and $170 million.
Inception budget: $160 million, 5 month shoot
Interstellar budget: $165 million, 4 month shoot
Dunkirk budget: $100 million, 4 month shoot
I'd guess the budget at between $120 million and $170 million.
Inception budget: $160 million, 5 month shoot
Interstellar budget: $165 million, 4 month shoot
Dunkirk budget: $100 million, 4 month shoot
This idea was sparked by a tweet from Brendan, and this is really just a silly thought experiment, BUT hear me out:
What if Nolan is kinda doing Roshomon, but with events taking place at full scale. He kind of plays with this idea in Dunkirk, so maybe he's just compounding on it.
What if we see subjective/alternative/contradictory versions of the same story from each of the leads points of view?
A movie with a full narrative, but told three times, each with a different take on the events. This would allow Nolan to write and film a normal movie's amount of material, but turn it into something long-form and, in a way, revolutionary.
Okay, thanks for reading my weird idea.
What if Nolan is kinda doing Roshomon, but with events taking place at full scale. He kind of plays with this idea in Dunkirk, so maybe he's just compounding on it.
What if we see subjective/alternative/contradictory versions of the same story from each of the leads points of view?
A movie with a full narrative, but told three times, each with a different take on the events. This would allow Nolan to write and film a normal movie's amount of material, but turn it into something long-form and, in a way, revolutionary.
Okay, thanks for reading my weird idea.
It's definitely possible. There's shades of that in Inception and The Prestige too.
-Vader
-Vader
Posts: 4193
Joined:
June 2010
Or maybe something like Lola Rennt, but with a sequence of story events progressively altered through time travel.TeddyBlass wrote: ↑April 8th, 2019, 8:04 pmThis idea was sparked by a tweet from Brendan, and this is really just a silly thought experiment, BUT hear me out:
What if Nolan is kinda doing Roshomon, but with events taking place at full scale. He kind of plays with this idea in Dunkirk, so maybe he's just compounding on it.
What if we see subjective/alternative/contradictory versions of the same story from each of the leads points of view?
A movie with a full narrative, but told three times, each with a different take on the events. This would allow Nolan to write and film a normal movie's amount of material, but turn it into something long-form and, in a way, revolutionary.
Okay, thanks for reading my weird idea.
