Page 114 of 144

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 3:08 pm
by rbej
Metacritic

WHICH CRITICS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN YOUR CALCULATIONS?

Movies

Arizona Republic
The A.V. Club
Austin Chronicle
Boston Globe
Charlotte Observer
Chicago Sun-Times
Chicago Tribune
Christian Science Monitor
CineVue
Consequence of Sound
Empire
Entertainment Weekly
The Film Stage
The Guardian
HitFix
The Hollywood Reporter
IGN
Indiewire
Los Angeles Times
Miami Herald
New Orleans Times-Picayune
New York Daily News
New York Magazine
New York Post
MTV News
New York Times
The New Yorker
New York Observer
NPR
Paste Magazine
Philadelphia Daily News
The Playlist
ReelViews
Rolling Stone
Salon.com
San Francisco Chronicle
ScreenCrush
Screen International
The Seatle Times
Slant Magazine
Slate
St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Tampa Bay Times
The Telegraph
Time
Time Out London
Time Out New York
Toronto Globe and Mail
Total Film
USA Today
Variety
The Verge
Village Voice
Vox
Wall Street Journal
Washington Post
We Got This Covered
TheWrap

Max 58 reviews.

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 3:11 pm
by Elyk988
WOO, back up a percent :gonf:

92%
184:17
8.6

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 3:15 pm
by NotoriousWolf
Elyk988 wrote:WOO, back up a percent :gonf:

92%
184:17
8.6
How many fresh does it need to get back up tp 93%

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 3:18 pm
by prescot
Thanks for the MC list. Any idea on which are the 8 remaining? Current MC total is 50 with Newyorker not yet posted

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 3:21 pm
by MuffinMcFluffin
NotoriousWolf wrote:
Elyk988 wrote:WOO, back up a percent :gonf:

92%
184:17
8.6
How many fresh does it need to get back up tp 93%
I believe 26 more fresh without another rotten.

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 3:23 pm
by Elyk988
NotoriousWolf wrote:
Elyk988 wrote:WOO, back up a percent :gonf:

92%
184:17
8.6
How many fresh does it need to get back up tp 93%
A LOT, lol. I doubt it will go any higher (needs like another 25 positives and no negatives), only lower at this point.

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 3:29 pm
by The Special Juan
RT % at this point means very little. Word of mouth will now take over as the most important factor for this film.

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 3:32 pm
by prescot
Agree. Boyhood at 100 MC lost out to Birdman at 88 MC for best picture and best director

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 3:36 pm
by EctoCooler31
An update on Metacritic:

Arizona Republic - 100
The A.V. Club - 91
Austin Chronicle - 100
Boston Globe - 88
Charlotte Observer -
Chicago Sun-Times - 100
Chicago Tribune - 75
Christian Science Monitor - 67
CineVue - 100
Consequence of Sound - 100
Empire - 100
Entertainment Weekly - 100
The Film Stage - 67
The Guardian - 100
HitFix -
The Hollywood Reporter - 100
IGN - 95
Indiewire - 100
Los Angeles Times - 100
Miami Herald -
New Orleans Times-Picayune - 80
New York Daily News - 90
New York Magazine - 70
New York Post - 75
MTV News -
New York Times - 100
The New Yorker -
New York Observer - 50
NPR -
Paste Magazine - 97
Philadelphia Daily News - 88
The Playlist - 100
ReelViews - 88
Rolling Stone - 100
Salon.com -
San Francisco Chronicle - 100
ScreenCrush - 70
Screen International - 100
The Seatle Times - 100
Slant Magazine - 38
Slate - 100
St. Louis Post-Dispatch - 100
Tampa Bay Times - 100
The Telegraph - 100
Time - 100
Time Out London - 80
Time Out New York -
Toronto Globe and Mail - 100
Total Film - 100
USA Today - 88
Variety - 100
The Verge -
Village Voice - 100
Vox - 90
Wall Street Journal - 100
Washington Post - 100
We Got This Covered -
TheWrap - 97

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 4:24 pm
by NotoriousWolf
It suck when 1 or 2 rottens hit it kills the score by like 2%.