Page 109 of 144

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 10:19 am
by jemme
It's still his best score on Rotten Tomatoes since The Dark Knight.

Metacritic is at 94 based on 50 reviews, which is just staggering.

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 10:20 am
by rickfox
Dragon_316ca wrote:RT: 91%

Fresh: 169
Rotten: 16

Avg rating: 8.7/10

:blank:

I feel so glad/relief that PHIL VILLARREAL gives Dunkirk a rotten mark

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 10:29 am
by rbej
Dunkirk is more for criticks than normal people.

People dont like war/movie without screenplay, lead hero, dialogues, blood and visable enemy.

Dunkirk is not movie for everyone.

RT 171/16 91% 8.6

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 10:30 am
by redfirebird2008
jemme wrote:It's still his best score on Rotten Tomatoes since The Dark Knight.

Metacritic is at 94 based on 50 reviews, which is just staggering.
It could very well end up with similar to Inception's 86% on RT while staying above 90 on MC. That is pretty crazy polarization between the blogger critics and supposed top critics.

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 10:32 am
by rbej
redfirebird2008 wrote:
jemme wrote:It's still his best score on Rotten Tomatoes since The Dark Knight.

Metacritic is at 94 based on 50 reviews, which is just staggering.
It could very well end up with similar to Inception's 86% on RT while staying above 90 on MC. That is pretty crazy polarization between the blogger critics and supposed top critics.
Inception is 74% on MC and 86% on RT

http://www.metacritic.com/movie/inception/
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/inception

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 10:34 am
by redfirebird2008
rbej wrote:
redfirebird2008 wrote:
jemme wrote:It's still his best score on Rotten Tomatoes since The Dark Knight.

Metacritic is at 94 based on 50 reviews, which is just staggering.
It could very well end up with similar to Inception's 86% on RT while staying above 90 on MC. That is pretty crazy polarization between the blogger critics and supposed top critics.
Inception is 74% on MC

http://www.metacritic.com/movie/inception/
Yes. That's normal. MC is supposed to be lower than the Tomato percentage (RT is 86% for Inception). Dunkirk is looking at the exact opposite scenario where MC stays above 90 and RT percentage possibly goes down into the mid-80's.

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 10:36 am
by MyCocaine
The space between the elite critics and blogger critics are quite telling.

Also, I'm not surprised to see the people of youtube and such not liking this film at all.

RT score is irrelevant from this point forward. MC has spoken and the acclaim is rapturous.

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 10:37 am
by rbej
Dunkirk is first Nolan movie where:

MC > RT

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/ ... rtime-epic

Positive

:)

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 10:41 am
by noodberd
No, Interstellar was the first

Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

Posted: July 21st, 2017, 10:46 am
by rbej
noodberd wrote:No, Interstellar was the first
Yes. You right. This is surprised for me.