Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

The 2017 World War II thriller about the evacuation of British and Allied troops from Dunkirk beach.

Posts: 489
Joined: December 2011
What is the best review for all you folks so far .the best written

User avatar
Oku
Posts: 3759
Joined: May 2012
All the ones that gave it a perfect rating.

I love them all equally. :lol:

User avatar
Posts: 2197
Joined: January 2016
Rolling Stone's review is pretty good.

User avatar
Posts: 3588
Joined: June 2010
Location: Secret Canadian Bunker
Dobson wrote:It climbed to 93% again on RT.
And back down to 92%.

User avatar
Posts: 149
Joined: January 2011
Dragon_316ca wrote:
Dobson wrote:It climbed to 93% again on RT.
And back down to 92%.
one rotten from Tony Macklin.
look at this guy scores:
La La Land 2.0/5
Manchester by the Sea 2.5/5
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 2.0/5
Kong: Skull Island 3.0/5
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
Posts: 4
Joined: July 2017
ShahrokhSam wrote:
Dragon_316ca wrote:
Dobson wrote:It climbed to 93% again on RT.
And back down to 92%.
one rotten from Tony Macklin.
look at this guy scores:
La La Land 2.0/5
Manchester by the Sea 2.5/5
Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 2.0/5
Kong: Skull Island 3.0/5
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
That dude should stop critiqueing movies... gave lots of great movies 1 and 2 stars. Checked out his other reviews. Awful critic.

User avatar
Posts: 1310
Joined: May 2017
Location: Elk Grove, CA
I don't know, seeing a twenties number instead of a tens number in the rotten column doesn't look that great.

Getting Rex Reed's score changed on there becomes that much more important for two reasons now.

User avatar
Posts: 2547
Joined: June 2011
MuffinMcFluffin wrote:I don't know, seeing a twenties number instead of a tens number in the rotten column doesn't look that great.

Getting Rex Reed's score changed on there becomes that much more important for two reasons now.
:roll: Yeah I don't think seeing a 20s number makes much difference. A 90%+ score, a top critics of 95%+ score and an avg. rating of 8.6 means more and looks much better.

User avatar
Posts: 1310
Joined: May 2017
Location: Elk Grove, CA
bootsy wrote:
MuffinMcFluffin wrote:I don't know, seeing a twenties number instead of a tens number in the rotten column doesn't look that great.

Getting Rex Reed's score changed on there becomes that much more important for two reasons now.
:roll: Yeah I don't think seeing a 20s number makes much difference. A 90%+ score and a top critics of 95%+ score means and looks much more/better.
Oh whoops, sorry. I didn't realize I prioritized tens of rotten scores over Tomatometer percentages.

EDIT: Actually, reading through my post, I never did that. Okay, carry on then.

Post Reply