Dunkirk Official Reviews Discussion

The 2017 World War II thriller about the evacuation of British and Allied troops from Dunkirk beach.
Post Reply
Scars
Posts: 39
Joined: December 2016
tommyjon400 wrote:There's so much stupid an unnecessary stuff in this movie, I don't even know where to begin. I'm still kinda shocked it doesn't have more negative reviews. This was Worse than Dark Knight Rises on so many levels.
What did you find unnecessary?
User avatar
Pratham
Posts: 13899
Joined: May 2010
Location: Mumbai
tommyjon400 wrote:There's so much stupid an unnecessary stuff in this movie
runtime: 106 minutes
User avatar
RIFA
Posts: 21411
Joined: June 2010
Location: All-Hail Master Virgo, Censor of NolanFans
tommyjon400 wrote:There's so much stupid an unnecessary stuff in this movie, I don't even know where to begin. This was Worse than Dark Knight Rises on so many levels.
Disagree.
tommyjon400 wrote:I'm still kinda shocked it doesn't have more negative reviews.
Agree.
MyCocaine
Posts: 3347
Joined: September 2013
Location: Copenhagen
94 on Metacritic from 52 reviews. 30 perfect scores.

Seems like the final score.
hasanahmad
Posts: 392
Joined: December 2011
Scars wrote:
tommyjon400 wrote:There's so much stupid an unnecessary stuff in this movie, I don't even know where to begin. I'm still kinda shocked it doesn't have more negative reviews. This was Worse than Dark Knight Rises on so many levels.
What did you find unnecessary?
He is disappointed in the movie . has posted in the past many dislike it. To him the 18 critics out of 230 are the many. Also he is a bit immature and asking users in other threads why they would watch it a second time . he is justifying through denial that its a bad movie and why anyone would think otherwise
prescot
Posts: 18
Joined: July 2017
MyCocaine wrote:94 on Metacritic from 52 reviews. 30 perfect scores.

Seems like the final score.
Thanks for the update. 30 perfect scores is impressive. No one would have seen this coming
User avatar
redfirebird2008
Posts: 2318
Joined: March 2010
Location: Texas
MyCocaine wrote:94 on Metacritic from 52 reviews. 30 perfect scores.

Seems like the final score.
Not sure. Could be another 10 reviews or so unless MC decides not to include some of the past publications that have always weighed in on Nolan's films. Examples are the Charlotte newspaper, Miami newspaper, Portland newspaper, etc.
rbej
Posts: 95
Joined: March 2015
redfirebird2008 wrote:
MyCocaine wrote:94 on Metacritic from 52 reviews. 30 perfect scores.

Seems like the final score.
Not sure. Could be another 10 reviews or so unless MC decides not to include some of the past publications that have always weighed in on Nolan's films. Examples are the Charlotte newspaper, Miami newspaper, Portland newspaper, etc.
58 reviews is max. Check Metacritic FAQ.

MC must correct yet New York Observer review. 3/4 stars is 75%, not 50% like MC posted.
User avatar
redfirebird2008
Posts: 2318
Joined: March 2010
Location: Texas
rbej wrote:
redfirebird2008 wrote:
MyCocaine wrote:94 on Metacritic from 52 reviews. 30 perfect scores.

Seems like the final score.
Not sure. Could be another 10 reviews or so unless MC decides not to include some of the past publications that have always weighed in on Nolan's films. Examples are the Charlotte newspaper, Miami newspaper, Portland newspaper, etc.
58 reviews is max. Check Metacritic FAQ.

MC must correct yet New York Observer review. 3/4 stars is 75%, not 50% like MC posted.
Ah, thanks. Did not realize the rule was 58. Very good then.
Last edited by redfirebird2008 on July 22nd, 2017, 3:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
NotoriousWolf
Posts: 133
Joined: December 2016
Auidence score is down to 86% on rt
Post Reply

Return to “Dunkirk”