antovolk wrote:Because everyone else apart from people on here does?
Unless you're seriously suggesting all the (LA-based) bloggers and film personalities, producers, DoPs and so on who are taking him seriously are complete dumbwits.
I gotta ask though, and this is one example: what do you think he meant when he said that he was working on 10 different versions of something that was going to be presented at CinemaCon?
Also, if he's supposed to be trustworthy and someone from the industry, shouldn't his twitter account be verified?
Probably a trailer, but they decided at last min to screen the existing prologue instead. Hence the 'sigh of relief' tweets. Stuff, particularly in regards to marketing, can change at the last minute just like that.
Well he has to decide himself if he wants to get it verified, it's not like Twitter does it themselves. Plus he's not a publicly credited figure that would benefit from verification, hell maybe Twitter won't verify him for that exact reason.
@Bacon, you're also discounting that people, you know, might have met him in person too? Let's not pretend that we're smarter than all the industry people that think he's legit, because if he was truly a fraud I'm pretty sure they'd have sussed it out a lot sooner.
Is that really supposed to be his job though? Is that what "producing documentation" means? But if stuff regarding marketing changes at last minute, why say anything at all? Why also say that Nolan's movie was supposed to be an original one that he sketched out as a teen when Emma said herself that she was the one who gave Nolan the idea. That doesn't just change at the last minute. It seems to me like he does it for attention (and yes, I understand the irony that we're giving him attention by talking about him) and exaggerates his involvement (that's assuming it exists) in Nolan's productions.
I continue to not believe him, but I guess understand why you do.
Last edited by Innovator on April 27th, 2017, 4:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Innovator wrote:
Is that really supposed to be his job though? Is that what "producing documentation" means? But if stuff regarding marketing changes at last minute, why say anything at all? Why also say that Nolan's movie was supposed to be an original one that he sketched out as a teen when Emma said herself that she was the one who gave Nolan the idea. That doesn't just change at the last minute. It seems to me like he does it for attention (and yes, I understand the irony that we're giving him attention by talking about him) and exaggerates his involvement (that's assuming it exists) in Nolan's productions.
I continue to not believe him, but I guess understand why you do.
Based on what he's been saying on Twitter and his Facebook, Nolan had him supervise the trailers we've gotten so far - or at least the December one and the one we are about to get.
I'm not saying he doesn't exaggerate stuff, and honestly I think there are times that he does (like on the day the teaser dropped and stupidly complaining about the whole TV spot thing) but that doesn't discount whatever insight/involvement he does have - and more importantly, people trusting him.
Look at the - yes, even verified users - interacting with him on the regular.
Can't we just have patience? If a trailer doesn't drop by June, then that would raise some eyebrows. But that's literally just over a month away. I guarantee we'll have a trailer within a month. How's that for confirmation?