35mm prints are usually under 2K resolution. For Dunkirk it doesn't even make sense to watch a 35mm print considering the whole movie was shot 65mm (mostly in IMAX 15/70). So even if you put it on par with 2K standard Digital, still there are far better choices in the list I made.AhmadAli95 wrote:Oh yeah I got it. I just mean they will figure out how to handle the whole process of switching between formats/using DATC. It's not my job to worry about this stuff It still is a bummer that a compromise has to be made.
Edit: is 35mm really that bad?
IMAX Locations and Info Thread
Posts: 136
Joined:
December 2011
@Michaelf2225 There seems to be a lot of variables that affect a 35mm screening compared to the "perfect every single time" digital 2K. I think in this argument, you both are right
@MisterXDTV I think I read stuff here about the process of making a 35mm print so I do understand what you're saying. I think If I had access to a 35mm screening of Dunkirk, I'd go just for the sake of it. To experience it in a different format. But yeah 70mm seems to be the optimal option.
I know I probably bombarded you with questions, but why would they use such lossy audio formats for 35mm & 70mm?
@MisterXDTV I think I read stuff here about the process of making a 35mm print so I do understand what you're saying. I think If I had access to a 35mm screening of Dunkirk, I'd go just for the sake of it. To experience it in a different format. But yeah 70mm seems to be the optimal option.
I know I probably bombarded you with questions, but why would they use such lossy audio formats for 35mm & 70mm?
Posts: 136
Joined:
December 2011
There's no choice: film projection audio is old technology and nobody "updated the system". Film projection digital audio is stuck in 1992-1993 when Dolby Digital and Datasat were created. And like IMAX DTAC, those systems are the only available that can run in sync with the film print itself....AhmadAli95 wrote:@Michaelf2225 There seems to be a lot of variables that affect a 35mm screening compared to the "perfect every single time" digital 2K. I think in this argument, you both are right
@MisterXDTV I think I read stuff here about the process of making a 35mm print so I do understand what you're saying. I think If I had access to a 35mm screening of Dunkirk, I'd go just for the sake of it. To experience it in a different format. But yeah 70mm seems to be the optimal option.
I know I probably bombarded you with questions, but why would they use such lossy audio formats for 35mm & 70mm?
Only with digital projection, we got uncompressed (PCM) audio....
It matters what it was shot on. A film entirely shot on 65mm will look better on a 35mm print than a 35mm shot film. Same goes for blu-ray. Entirely shot on 65mm will look better in 1080p than a film shot in 35mm.
Posts: 136
Joined:
December 2011
Yes, but for a 65mm shot film, 35mm is still a huge bottleneck compared to 4K Digital, 4K Laser Digital, or 65mm film....Nomis wrote:It matters what it was shot on. A film entirely shot on 65mm will look better on a 35mm print than a 35mm shot film. Same goes for blu-ray. Entirely shot on 65mm will look better in 1080p than a film shot in 35mm.
Tickets goes on sale Friday. Sweet Jesus! 70MM + IMAX
Posts: 136
Joined:
December 2011
Imperial Copenaghen is standard 5/70 film, not IMAX....MyCocaine wrote:
Tickets goes on sale Friday. Sweet Jesus! 70MM + IMAX
Last edited by MisterXDTV on July 5th, 2017, 10:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
For any Florida peeps doing 4K Laser at AutoNation IMAX... How do you get priority seating?
Don't lecture me.MisterXDTV wrote:Imperial Copenaghen is standard 5/70 film, not IMAX....
Copenhagen both has 70mm at Imperial and IMAX at Cinemaxx.
Also, why don't you fuck off with those condescending commas.
Calm down, yoMyCocaine wrote:Don't lecture me.MisterXDTV wrote:Imperial Copenaghen is standard 5/70 film, not IMAX....
Copenhagen both has 70mm at Imperial and IMAX at Cinemaxx.
Also, why don't you fuck off with those condescending commas.