Will McCrabbUser of Interest wrote:What clown?Panapaok wrote:
Trailer #2
Oh...willaartwillem wrote:Will McCrabb
I just realised that the Warner Bros UK YouTube-account calls this trailer "Dunkirk - Survival Teaser" and not "Dunkirk - Trailer 1" like the Warner Bros Pictures account.
So, this trailer is actually more a teaser than a main trailer? That would mean, as I thought, that Trailer #3 will be the main trailer.
So, this trailer is actually more a teaser than a main trailer? That would mean, as I thought, that Trailer #3 will be the main trailer.
Yeah, exactly. Teaser 2.willaartwillem wrote:I just realised that the Warner Bros UK YouTube-account calls this trailer "Dunkirk - Survival Teaser" and not "Dunkirk - Trailer 1" like the Warner Bros Pictures account.
So, this trailer is actually more a teaser than a main trailer? That would mean, as I thought, that Trailer #3 will be the main trailer.
this movie looks v bad imho. sand is bad. all bad movies have a lot of sand.
Posts: 327
Joined:
May 2016
....says the guy from Indiana, where all "sand experts" live.Nelson wrote:this movie looks v bad imho. sand is bad. all bad movies have a lot of sand.
i live here to stay away from sandShady1 wrote:....says the guy from Indiana, where all "sand experts" live.Nelson wrote:this movie looks v bad imho. sand is bad. all bad movies have a lot of sand.
Sand is the devilNelson wrote:this movie looks v bad imho. sand is bad. all bad movies have a lot of sand.
exactly! dunkirk at best will be 3/10.Sysmatic wrote:Sand is the devilNelson wrote:this movie looks v bad imho. sand is bad. all bad movies have a lot of sand.
yes. nolan's a hack amiriteNelson wrote:exactly! dunkirk at best will be 3/10.Sysmatic wrote:Sand is the devilNelson wrote:this movie looks v bad imho. sand is bad. all bad movies have a lot of sand.