The 2017 World War II thriller about the evacuation of British and Allied troops from Dunkirk beach.
dunkirktrash wrote:They posted a promotional link, like the ones you use for albums and singles and quoted a fan's tweet with two pictures of one of his bandmates. It was really random. It wasn't like, a shameful mistake or anything. But yeah, there's no way he would tweet that. He doesn't randomly tweet pictures of anyone.
Harry was hacked! it wasn't promotional link. It was link to porn. Why are you telling people wrong information?
And I'm 100% sure Harry wrote a tweet about Dunkirk himself. I mean, the words are his, doesn't matter who posted it. It is what he said to write anyway.
and why are we arguing about this? lol it's not that big deal, people.
Someone just HAD to ruin it. I apologise on their behalf. Anyway, I'm happy Harry is fulfilling expectations. I knew he'd be good because he's not the kind of person that would jump into something like this if he wasn't serious about it. But it's still a relief to see that he's actually good.
Joined:
October 2014
Location: ny but philly has my <3
he... blends in with everybody else
i mean this as a huge compliment
Considering who 'everybody else' includes, I do take it as a compliment. I feel like I'm one of the only people who hasn't watched it and I'm itching tbh. I'm lurking the forums and replying to stupid shut (more than usual) because I'm so anxious.
His role was pretty
for the most part, but he did a good job with what he had.
Joined:
April 2014
Location: Atomic Forge
redfirebird2008 wrote:Just want to say to the Styles fans who have joined this forum...your guy did a very good job in this movie. Nolan wasn't lying and the critics weren't lying either. Harry earned his seat at the table as Nolan said.
Sorry, but I'll disagree with that. The number of close-up shots and the distance his character was from the camera most of the time are saying Nolan was... slightly exaggerating while saying Styles's performance is incredibly nuanced. It is paradoxical.
Lord Shade wrote:
Sorry, but I'll disagree with that. The number of close-up shots and the distance his character was from the camera most of the time are saying Nolan was... slightly exaggerating while saying Styles's performance is incredibly nuanced. It is paradoxical.
I'll disagree with that))) Harry had a lot of close-ups as I remember and I actually really like what he did when he was in the distance. Totally was a good performance from him.
Yeah, in my second viewing, I caught a ton of instances of close-ups of Mr. Styles.
Joined:
January 2011
Location: Here?
