Interesting. I thought some shots in the trailers had color pallets that I dont remember seeing much in Nolan's work, but it's had to tell in a trailer with it being so fast and also in trailers post production isn't finished so things will often look different.Vesh wrote:Hell yes.ComptonTerry wrote:
I won't ask you a million different question, just got 1 more... Can you tell that Wally wasn't here for this? Does Hoytes cinematography have a distinct look and signature to it that looks different?
Edit: I say this as someone who is obsessed with cinematography. Things like camera angles, focus, camera movement were very distinct in my opinion.
'Interstellar' Reviews Discussion
I could've done another hour. I think it could've been a masterpiece with maybe 30 more minutes.thegreypilgrim wrote:Does anyone else feel like another 30 minutes would not have been a bad thing at all?
Maybe not 30, but a lot was rushed.thegreypilgrim wrote:Does anyone else feel like another 30 minutes would not have been a bad thing at all?
-Vader
Yeah, I haven't seen much of Gyasi but he brought a lot of honesty to his character. Was very impressed with him.Allstar wrote:Awesome, I have high expectations for Irwin. Surprised you have Gyasi ahead of Hathway and Chastain, interesting.
I've been hearing fantastic things about Damon so that ranking does not surprise me in the slightest.
Like what? Aside from one or two instances, I can't think of a hell of a lot more they could have spent more time on.Vader182 wrote:Maybe not 30, but a lot was rushed.thegreypilgrim wrote:Does anyone else feel like another 30 minutes would not have been a bad thing at all?
-Vader
Although the color was different, I think it was the least of the differences on cinematography. The framing actually stood ut to me the most. Very different from Nolan's typical fare.ComptonTerry wrote:Interesting. I thought some shots in the trailers had color pallets that I dont remember seeing much in Nolan's work, but it's had to tell in a trailer with it being so fast and also in trailers post production isn't finished so things will often look different.Vesh wrote:Hell yes.ComptonTerry wrote:
I won't ask you a million different question, just got 1 more... Can you tell that Wally wasn't here for this? Does Hoytes cinematography have a distinct look and signature to it that looks different?
Edit: I say this as someone who is obsessed with cinematography. Things like camera angles, focus, camera movement were very distinct in my opinion.
Posts: 1049
Joined:
May 2013
ChristNolan wrote:Like what? Aside from one or two instances, I can't think of a hell of a lot more they could have spent more time on.Vader182 wrote:Maybe not 30, but a lot was rushed.thegreypilgrim wrote:Does anyone else feel like another 30 minutes would not have been a bad thing at all?
-Vader
Last edited by thegreypilgrim on November 5th, 2014, 2:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
I think this was a product of editing. I thought some of the editing was a bit chaotic in the latter 2/3 of the film. I need to see it again to be sure, I was too engrossed in what was happening to judge.ChristNolan wrote:Like what? Aside from one or two instances, I can't think of a hell of a lot more they could have spent more time on.Vader182 wrote:Maybe not 30, but a lot was rushed.thegreypilgrim wrote:Does anyone else feel like another 30 minutes would not have been a bad thing at all?
-Vader
I actually think it's one of Nolan's better edited films. A lot of creative and unique choices were made, hats off to Lee Smith.
-Vader