Same and its getting annoying as hell. It makes its seem like it fails completely using that saying.lcbaseball22 wrote:Uhh, how many critics are going to use this cliche, Interstellar "gets LOST IN SPACE".xWhereAmI? wrote:http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movi ... /18018445/
3/4
Seems more like a negative review than a 3/4 review
I swear I've seen this 4 or 5 times already...
'Interstellar' Reviews Discussion
Posts: 55632
Joined:
May 2010
That's what want to know as well.poplar wrote:When should Empire release their review?
Yeah, considering Lost In Space is among the worst movies ever made (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120738/)xWhereAmI? wrote:Same and its getting annoying as hell. It makes its seem like it fails completely using that saying.lcbaseball22 wrote:Uhh, how many critics are going to use this cliche, Interstellar "gets LOST IN SPACE".xWhereAmI? wrote:http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movi ... /18018445/
3/4
Seems more like a negative review than a 3/4 review
I swear I've seen this 4 or 5 times already...
BTW, it looks like RT has finally added a few more reviews (2 fresh, 1 rotten)
Posts: 1519
Joined:
January 2013
"BTW, it looks like RT has finally added a few more reviews (2 fresh, 1 rotten)"
Does anybody know why a review with a score of 3 out of 5 stars be considered a negative review. It doesn't make sense.
Does anybody know why a review with a score of 3 out of 5 stars be considered a negative review. It doesn't make sense.
Are critics who decide if it is rotten or not.radewart wrote:"BTW, it looks like RT has finally added a few more reviews (2 fresh, 1 rotten)"
Does anybody know why a review with a score of 3 out of 5 stars be considered a negative review. It doesn't make sense.
It seems the bigest problem which is drawing to mixed reviews is the pace: basically as slow as 2001.
I've heard/read completely different sides to this; some saying that if 20 minutes or so were cut it might be a masterpiece (or more so) and others saying it's very brisk and not long enough! If you watched the AMC Film Talk video he said he would have been good with 4 hrs.Biribiri wrote:It seems the bigest problem which is drawing to mixed reviews is the pace: basically as slow as 2001.
Sort of reminds me of TDKR, to be honest. I thought it tried to include too much, and at the same time it could have benefitted from an extra hour.lcbaseball22 wrote:I've heard/read completely different sides to this; some saying that if 20 minutes or so were cut it might be a masterpiece (or more so) and others saying it's very brisk and not long enough! If you watched the AMC Film Talk video he said he would have been good with 4 hrs.Biribiri wrote:It seems the bigest problem which is drawing to mixed reviews is the pace: basically as slow as 2001.
I'm trying so hard to stay out of this section of NF, but when I realized there were reviews today I caved. Big mistake, can't let these reviews influence my level of hype. Oh the anxiety.....
So with regards to Metacritic let me remind that Inception finished with only a 74 (http://www.metacritic.com/movie/inception) and yet it was the #2 film of the year when it came to Critics Top 10 lists...
I could see a similar fate for Interstellar but is it just me or were Inception's poor to lukewarm reviews not because "it fell short" or "its intellectual reach exceeded its grasp"? I seem to recall that those who did not like Inception simply said it was confusing or something of that sort...
I feel like with Interstellar it's more "flawed masterpiece" or falls well short of a masterpiece, tries to be too grand, overly sentimental, etc. I don't know I just get a different impression for the reception so far.
http://criticstop10.com/best-of-2010/2. Inception (273 lists; 55 top spots)
“Nolan’s film is surely the most ambitious psychological thriller ever, and yet also the most personal. His baroque imagination makes most directors’ efforts look like beach-pail sand castles alongside Mad King Ludwig’s Neuschwanstein Castle.” — Colin Covert, Minneapolis Star Tribune
I could see a similar fate for Interstellar but is it just me or were Inception's poor to lukewarm reviews not because "it fell short" or "its intellectual reach exceeded its grasp"? I seem to recall that those who did not like Inception simply said it was confusing or something of that sort...
I feel like with Interstellar it's more "flawed masterpiece" or falls well short of a masterpiece, tries to be too grand, overly sentimental, etc. I don't know I just get a different impression for the reception so far.