lcbaseball22 wrote:After seeing the spread of scores from the BFCA site I'm not too concerned about the overall score; if it weren't for these extremists it would have the 85+ that dictates award consideration

http://www.criticschoice.com/members/ccampbell/ (50)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/acampbell/ (30)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/mdelarosa/ (60 but I point this one out become of how love/hate his ratings are, it's ridiculous)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/dfreedman/ (50)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/rjay/ (50)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/TalkCineman/ (40)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/kjohnson/ (20)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/rjustavick/ (50)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/zkit/ (20)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/fmastracci/ (20)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/jmurphy/ (50)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/rmurray/ (40)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/mpaurich/ (50)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/msmith/ (50)
http://www.criticschoice.com/members/hstratford/ (50)

I just don't see how anyone could rate the film a 50, let alone a 20. I mean I didn't love the film but I'd have to say there's enough quality craftsmanship to warrant at least a 60 even if an individual doesn't like it. Personally I'd give it an 80 or 90 by their rating scale and fortunately there's enough that agree and many who rate it a 100 to balance out all the imbeciles listed above for an overall average of 80/100 which given all those low scores is quite impressive! I noticed also that the higher grades tended to come from more legit critics such as Laremy Legel of Film.com He is an RT Top Critic and he scored Interstellar a 100. Also Chris Knight of the National Post gave it a 100 and Dave Karger (Fandango) and Justin Craig (FoxNews) are a few among those who gave 90's.

ChristNolan wrote:

Panapaok wrote:

ChristNolan wrote:

AsianVersionOfET wrote:And it's my opinion it's his best film to date and deserves 100/100