xWhereAmI? wrote:I still don't get the space shots. They looks BRILLIANT but
Trailer #2
ChristNolan wrote:xWhereAmI? wrote:I still don't get the space shots. They looks BRILLIANT but
xWhereAmI? wrote:ChristNolan wrote:xWhereAmI? wrote:I still don't get the space shots. They looks BRILLIANT but
True, I guess not all space films are "space voyages"...still the fact that people are throwing around mentions of 2001: A Space Odyssey as inspiration or whatever is a bit concerning consider that "classic" is one of the most over-rated IMO.ChristNolan wrote:What? Name all the high budget space voyages that are currently in circulation. And theres a difference between a space voyage film and film that features space (like Gravity).lcbaseball22 wrote: I wonder if this is bad timing on Nolan's part with so many space voyage films already in circulation
This trailer gave me a feeling of massive scope. Something that I haven't felt since watching movies from the 90's like Contact for example. It also feels like the biggest movie ever.
Posts: 1049
Joined:
May 2013
Credibility: gone.lcbaseball22 wrote:True, I guess not all space films are "space voyages"...still the fact that people are throwing around mentions of 2001: A Space Odyssey as inspiration or whatever is a bit concerning consider that "classic" is one of the most over-rated IMO.ChristNolan wrote:What? Name all the high budget space voyages that are currently in circulation. And theres a difference between a space voyage film and film that features space (like Gravity).lcbaseball22 wrote: I wonder if this is bad timing on Nolan's part with so many space voyage films already in circulation
Nah, Kubrick is alright but Hitchcock made far better films.
I'm a fan of classics, just not 2001 It's style over substance.
I'm a fan of classics, just not 2001 It's style over substance.
Last edited by lcbaseball22 on May 16th, 2014, 8:53 pm, edited 2 times in total.
^Guys please don't let any of that derail the topic at hand.
Anyways, Caine is to Nolan as Sam Jackson is to Tarantino. His dialogue is like pure poetry every time.
Anyways, Caine is to Nolan as Sam Jackson is to Tarantino. His dialogue is like pure poetry every time.
Read the book. Nothing about that movie was "abstract bullshit." It all had a purpose. I'm willing to answer any questions if you have any.lcbaseball22 wrote:Nah, Kubrick is alright but Hitchcock was far better. I'm a fan of classics, just not 2001 It was abstract bullshit and style over substance.
You're right. Easy to get off topic. It's surprising how many people criticize Caine's reappearance in Nolan's movies. If he's a good actor then what's the problem?ChristNolan wrote:^Guys please don't let any of that derail the topic at hand.
Anyways, Caine is to Nolan as Sam Jackson is to Tarantino. His dialogue is like pure poetry every time.