I agree with your interpretation of that. I also think perhaps he sees his wife through Murph, which adds to his connection with her.Aili wrote:It's such a scream that people criticize Interstellar for being "unrealistic" while they praise a goofball cartoon like GotG. Honestly, how dumb are they?
The only criticism of Interstellar I've seen that was amusing was some guy wrote "I think it's rude of Matthew McConaughey to talk during Hans Zimmer's organ concert".
As for Tom getting short shrift, Coop is pretty macho and so is Tom. Tom's a teenager and teenagers don't like physical displays of affection from their parents, especially not guys and their dads. Murph is little and was probably just a very little girl when her mother died so Coop has to be mother and father to her which changes the relationship. Coop feels a lot more protective towards her and that's normal. Tom's independent and Murph isn't. So all that criticism is just pointless.
Interstellar General Information
Posts: 381
Joined:
November 2014
Right.AsianVersionOfET wrote:Right?Nomis1700 wrote:
Posts: 836
Joined:
January 2014
Eclectic Method has done their rap remix of Interstellar. It's not bad though doesn't come close to their masterpiece they did for the Wolf of Wall Street (on the same page to compare).
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Interste ... 70645.html
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Interste ... 70645.html
So if I go in with expectations that a movie will be mediocre with little to no ambition and it meets those expectations, it's a good movie? Yeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Posts: 94
Joined:
July 2010
Hustler wrote:So if I go in with expectations that a movie will be mediocre with little to no ambition and it meets those expectations, it's a good movie? Yeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Hustler wrote:So if I go in with expectations that a movie will be mediocre with little to no ambition and it meets those expectations, it's a good movie? Yeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Posts: 207
Joined:
October 2014
Just seen furious 7. i cant belive it has 86 percent on rotten tomatoes.that movie sucked.the action is so over the top with terrible dialogue and michael bayesque ass shots.i cant belive these same critics gave interstellar 72 percent .it just shows that alot of them are harsh on nolan whilst other thigs get a pass for being dumb stupid but fun
The butthurt is strong with some of you guys. What does IMDb have to do with anything? Who gives a flying fuck about IMDb?Aili wrote: Back to trolling the IMDb for you dude!
Flawless logic you have there. GotG is not a good movie by my standards. It's just a watchable movie, nothing more. Yet it's still better constructed as a movie than Interstellar.Hustler wrote:So if I go in with expectations that a movie will be mediocre with little to no ambition and it meets those expectations, it's a good movie? Yeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Lies.Demo wrote: Dropping in occasionally in hopes to see news of a new Nolan project that can transcend space and time without the power of love.
Anyone with common sense wouldn't even say that or at least not even with the tiniest bit of understanding of filmmaking.Demo wrote: Flawless logic you have there. GotG is not a good movie by my standards. It's just a watchable movie, nothing more. Yet it's still better constructed as a movie than Interstellar.
