I can't get to the site for some reason, is there a score that it got?
TDKR Reviews Discussion
Posts: 3323
Joined:
June 2010
Posts: 223
Joined:
June 2012
God, is that you?IWatchFilmsNotMovies wrote:Reviews are a bit underwhelming.
Always so hard to please. Let me be straight with you... Earth is a bit underwhelming, too. In fact, I give it a 1/10. Now go back to heaven and play with your angel friends and Jesus, and quit trolling.
Thanks.
Posts: 15900
Joined:
June 2009
Robin wrote:It seems like WB cheated the bloggers (/Film, Collider, Cinemablend, HitFix ect) by not inviting them to the screenings. It sure looks like they only screened it for the "big" print critics. Smart move of WB, if you want people that have promoted the shit out of your movie, for years and years, see it last.
What the fuck WB??
I think it was a good move... The bloggers gave been getting big headed about the importance of their word... It was a good way to burst their bubble
You didn't see it zomg!mchekhov wrote: I think it was a good move...
How COULD mchekhov/Talli have even seen it? He's no critic.
Posts: 223
Joined:
June 2012
No. But he is a liar.NoMoreDeadCops wrote:How COULD mchekhov/Talli have even seen it? He's no critic.
Posts: 196
Joined:
May 2012
Where did he say he saw it?NoMoreDeadCops wrote:How COULD mchekhov/Talli have even seen it? He's no critic.
Posts: 151
Joined:
June 2012
+1YourLiberation123 wrote:Where did he say he saw it?NoMoreDeadCops wrote:How COULD mchekhov/Talli have even seen it? He's no critic.
Posts: 196
Joined:
May 2012
I don't keep up with the gossip, condemn me.robboadam31 wrote:+1YourLiberation123 wrote:
Where did he say he saw it?
Posts: 151
Joined:
June 2012
No, I'm agreeing with you.YourLiberation123 wrote:I don't keep up with the gossip, condemn me.robboadam31 wrote:
+1
