prince0gotham wrote:Are you serious?mchekhov wrote:
Last edited by Cilogy on July 9th, 2012, 11:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Spoilers tagged.
Reason: Spoilers tagged.
hey teddy read this and tell me why that faggot is still here?prince0gotham wrote:So who's gonna bet he's gonna backtrack by saying he was joking now?
Or if he really was, again, wtf?
Is that his 'tom wins'? Or should I stop giving him ideas?
If that was a joke it was a lame one...prince0gotham wrote:So who's gonna bet he's gonna backtrack by saying he was joking now?
Or if he really was, again, wtf?
Or should I stop giving him ideas?
Prince is right. Btw, I wouldn't suggest banning someone and call him a "faggot" in the same sentence. It doesn't really add to your credibility.Mr. Caine wrote:hey teddy read this and tell me why that faggot is still here?prince0gotham wrote:So who's gonna bet he's gonna backtrack by saying he was joking now?
Or if he really was, again, wtf?
Is that his 'tom wins'? Or should I stop giving him ideas?
I never have credibility anywaysCelestin wrote:If that was a joke it was a lame one...prince0gotham wrote:So who's gonna bet he's gonna backtrack by saying he was joking now?
Or if he really was, again, wtf?
Or should I stop giving him ideas?
Prince is right. Btw, I wouldn't suggest banning someone and call him a "faggot" in the same sentence. It doesn't really add to your credibility.Mr. Caine wrote: hey teddy read this and tell me why that faggot is still here?
BTW, I first thought you were referring to Prince as a faggot. Sorry.Mr. Caine wrote:I never have credibility anywaysCelestin wrote:
If that was a joke it was a lame one...
Prince is right. Btw, I wouldn't suggest banning someone and call him a "faggot" in the same sentence. It doesn't really add to your credibility.