Which was deeper?

The 2012 superhero epic about Batman's struggle to overcome the terrorist leader Bane, as well as his own inner demons.
User avatar
Posts: 4395
Joined: July 2012
Location: Here, there, what's the difference?
I can't tell which one was the deepest for me between BB and TDK, but TDKR was the less deep for me.

Posts: 323
Joined: August 2012
TDKR, of course.

User avatar
Posts: 26396
Joined: February 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Each film had its own palette of themes and tones that are relatively equal in their magnitude, but in terms of what I connected with more, TDKR wins in that regard.
If she plays cranium she gives good brainium.

User avatar
Posts: 2076
Joined: August 2012
Location: The Wasteland
Cilogy wrote:Each film had its own palette of themes and tones that are relatively equal in their magnitude, but in terms of what I connected with more, TDKR wins in that regard.
My feelings as well. Vader's post also touches on many of my thoughts regarding the depth of TDKR. Also, to me, the wider variety of characters in TDKR and each's own part to play within the movie's theme(s) as well as in their own character arc added depth beyond that offered in TDK. The number of times I've seen the movie compared to the other two Nolan/Batman films (all excellent, imo) and how each time I saw it I could find something new to analyze/contemplate also was an indicator of its depth.

Posts: 91
Joined: May 2011
Location: Bangladesh
for me TDK was the deepest of them all. harvey dent's fraustation, joker showing us the exact reality of citizens mind was just chilling. TDKR has it's varieties but TDK felt more deeper.

Posts: 1546
Joined: May 2012
Location: Missouri
Vader182 wrote:The Dark Knight Rises.

For Rises, there's a big obvious link to Nolan implying the general risk of a collapsing society and how that can happen.
It's alarming and almost inspiring the prophetic nature of broader strokes of the narrative being laid down long prior to the wall street movement, and for a film making Gotham a contemporary Pars from the French Revolution and hinting our current society is beginning to be at risk of similar social and class problems, albeit in a far less extreme way, we may face a sort of revolution and then there's the wall street movement and others that are sure to follow. It sort of exposes Nolan's pulse on what "worries' society today, making me wonder what sort of impact his films will have on future audiences because his films seem at times so tailored to the audiences viewing them at the time of release. The risk of total societal collapse is terrifying to many, and given how Bane basically merely enables the lower class to rise up by (mostly) telling them the truth about Gotham, it has pretty horrifying truths within society, theirs and ours. If the aristocrats continue oppressing the lower class, there's an inevitability to an uprising vying to reverse the roles and revert to essentially a "share the spoils" communistic or socialistic (are those words?) dominated by a dangerous mob mentality overflowing with brutality (the courts, general treatment of the upper class, seemingly condoning mass terrorist attacks across Gotham- it's indicated the lower class were well aware of a "storm coming" and were excited for it).

I'm not sure if it can be classified as a "theme' as much as a storytelling and thematic tool, but (like A Tale of Two Cities) the notion of "doubles" plays heavily in most major arcs.

-Foley and Gordon: political climber vs someone to show everything Gordon isn't and it's Gordon's "fault" cops like this exist because of the Dent act.

-Blake and Gordon: Showing Gordon who he is.

-Blake and Bruce: Obvious- they're essentially the same person. Natural detective, similar emotional paths, similar stance on guns, similar disregard for one's own safety for the sake of helping others.

-Bruce and Selina: Challenges most of his thinking in a playful and seductive manner, she's searching similarly for redemption, etc.

-Bruce and Bane: Obvious, both have masks, both interacted with the league, Bane is everything Bruce would be had he made one different choice going back to Begins enriching the power of Bruce's own choice while tearing down everything Batman was and is, both are driven by compassion for the innocent (Bane's entire story starting with his desire for redemption by protecting the innocent).

There's other things like every major character actively seeking redemption and relief from past misdeeds and consequences. The primary exception is John Blake, making him the noble and powerful underpinning that grounds much of the narrative.

Not that this is a theme necessarily either, but the notion that the key to escaping past demons and achieve ultimate redemption is embracing fear and living through that, showing a healthy sense of self worth. When Bruce escapes the pit, he no longer needs Batman to become the monster within, Batman's no longer an outlet for Bruce's negative, damaged emotions, but becomes the symbol and guardian for a city that only he could then be while preparing Blake for the task. There's that notion of immorality and the legend and legacy Bruce leaves as a measure for a city to repair itself. Foley, a character representative of the political climbers in Gotham that were previously dismissive of the city's well being (going for Gordon's commissioner position and consistently undermining Gordon) is finally redeemed in the final act, implying that growth within Gotham's citizens.

Finally, in the ending of the film, (and this connects back to what opened this rant/analysis with) Nolan makes the bold choice to imply the system's of man are perpetually flawed and will always, on some level, necessitate justice outside of a system, even a mostly good one. There's no 'fixing' the problem, the system itself is part of the problem, and always will be.

Even in the emotionally uplifting conclusion, this is by far Nolan's most cynical and critical film of society on every level, frankly condemning the upper class and lower class in spades, but always remembering the triumphant quality of redemption. The Dark Knight may possess impacting themes contemplating the struggles of conceding moral standards in the face of terrorism and ultimately questioning some of society's morality and laws, but The Dark Knight Rises serves as an awakening in social realism unprecedented in much of contemporary film, taking on every layer of modern civilization. Heavy, profound stuff for a 250 million dollar spectacular.

-Vader
Amazing write up Vader:-) I agree. For me if I had to pick which movie hit me 'deeper' and which movie I feel explored 'deeper' themes it would have to be TDKR. Bruce came full circle, and the themes of redemption, belief, morality, fear, self sacrifice, pain, forgiveness, and love..all played a huge part on a bigger level than TDK for me.

Posts: 88
Joined: December 2011
TDKR > BB > TDK

Posts: 4794
Joined: January 2012
i think TDKR had a deeper villain. the joker is a great theatric liar but since he's an unreliable narrator i cannot take anything he says seriously. so when he says he's an anarchist i call BS because five minutes later he says "everyone left here plays by my rules", which is the complete opposite of anarchist philosphy; you try to live in harmony together by choosing to respect other around you by your own free will, not try to impose your views on others. the joker and batman also don't seem that similar because while both work outside of acceptable social norms, the joker kills like a hundred people a day whereas batman never crosses that line (ok he struggles but that does not mean they're similar). they're different solutions to the same problem, which is random criminality. bane and batman seem like two sides of the same coin; both are legendary fighters disguising their true identity; both represent authoritative responses to socio-political problems but where batman seems conflicted bane is completely in love with his own power and both try to motivate the apathetic masses and ultimately both succeed in their own way but the difference is that bane is being dishonest, while denouncing the hypocrisy of the american society, which makes him the bigges hypocrite ever. Also, his mask relieves him of the pain (in a literal sense of course) whereas batman's pain is emotional as opposed to physical and so his mask is not his ultimate undoing because he's not bound to it. whereas batman's legend is built on truth mostly, bane takes credit for someone else's deeds and can only function with the help of his anasthetic. the joker is just that tempting devil (which is great but ultimately it's what you'd expect from the joker). the dark knight rises also accounts for the fact that the world of superheros and money are not separate and that it does matter because the disenfranchised will not take it forever and in the form of catwoman and bane we have two disenfranchised people using extreme methods against a society they perceive to be extremely corrupt and hypocritical, just as batman does. the dark knight is a metaphor on the abuse of civil liberties in light of extreme violence, whereas the dark knight rises is about leadership and the different forms it can take: bane's revolution is a lie and is only designed to get himself into power until he cannot physically own gotham anymore. if anything, tdkr did that nietzschean thing about "the abyss looks back through you" even more so than TDK. If that's not deep i don't know what is.

User avatar
Posts: 3855
Joined: June 2010
TDK>BB>TDKR
Truth is, sometimes I miss you so bad I can hardly stand it. - Jack Twist

Posts: 102
Joined: September 2012
Location: bryant denny stadium
tdk handsdown

Post Reply