Chris435 wrote:
With LOTR, every movie was epic and high quality. Not quite the case with the DK trilogy.
Your Thoughts On the "Dark Knight" Trilogy
Posts: 9038
Joined:
July 2010
It's my favorite trilogy of all time, without a doubt.
Ok, let me think...With LOTR, every movie was epic and high quality. Not quite the case with the DK trilogy.
TFOTR - The best in the trilogy IMO
TTT -
One of most boring movies I've EVER watched in my life (I finally said it)TROTK - It supposed to be the most epic of the three but fail because has like one hundred endings.
So, NO. Not every movie is epic and hight quality (IMO). I think TDK trilogy is far more interesting and F*** epic!
Posts: 441
Joined:
June 2012
ok, you don't even have to use LOTR. Star Wars is another example though. Star Wars has 2 movies comparable to Dark Knight. The Dark Knight trilogy has 2 movies (DKR & BB) that don't quite reach the heights of Star Wars IV: A New Hope. ROTJ is comparable to BB in terms of quality. So I got Star Wars as a better trilogy. Its got more classics.natalie wrote:Ok, let me think...With LOTR, every movie was epic and high quality. Not quite the case with the DK trilogy.
TFOTR - The best in the trilogy IMO
TTT -
TROTK - It supposed to be the most epic of the three but fail because has like one hundred endings.
So, NO. Not every movie is epic and hight quality (IMO). I think TDK trilogy is far more interesting and F*** epic!
IMO, LOTR has 3 movies which rival any SW movies. However, if you want to be strict, it has 2 movies (Fellowship & ROTK) that are comparable to Star Wars 2 biggies. Two Towers blows out ROTJ though.
Posts: 88
Joined:
December 2011
I give the DK trilogy the edge because the LOTR trilogy was based on one story that happened to be split into three books/parts. Not to mention the three films were all made at the same time. It's no surprise the three films kept the same look and feel throughout the trilogy. Of course it works as a trilogy, it's just one story adapted from a 3-part book and one kind of movie.Chris435 wrote:ok, you don't even have to use LOTR. Star Wars is another example though. Star Wars has 2 movies comparable to Dark Knight. The Dark Knight trilogy has 2 movies (DKR & BB) that don't quite reach the heights of Star Wars IV: A New Hope. ROTJ is comparable to BB in terms of quality. So I got Star Wars as a better trilogy. Its got more classics.natalie wrote:
Ok, let me think...
TFOTR - The best in the trilogy IMO
TTT -
TROTK - It supposed to be the most epic of the three but fail because has like one hundred endings.
So, NO. Not every movie is epic and hight quality (IMO). I think TDK trilogy is far more interesting and F*** epic!
IMO, LOTR has 3 movies which rival any SW movies. However, if you want to be strict, it has 2 movies (Fellowship & ROTK) that are comparable to Star Wars 2 biggies. Two Towers blows out ROTJ though.
The Dark Knight trilogy, on the other hand, was produced over a span of 8-9 years. Three stories written years apart. Three different kinds of movies: hero's journey, crime thriller, war film. So that makes it a much more impressive feat to maintain that consistent level of quality while tying them all together.
This.robphas wrote:
I give the DK trilogy the edge because the LOTR trilogy was based on one story that happened to be split into three books/parts. Not to mention the three films were all made at the same time. It's no surprise the three films kept the same look and feel throughout the trilogy. Of course it works as a trilogy, it's just one story adapted from a 3-part book and one kind of movie.
The Dark Knight trilogy, on the other hand, was produced over a span of 8-9 years. Three stories written years apart. Three different kinds of movies: hero's journey, crime thriller, war film. So that makes it a much more impressive feat to maintain that consistent level of quality while tying them all together.
Posts: 211
Joined:
May 2012
definitely agree. each film was different in nearly every way, but still continued the journey of the main character. not an easy thing to do in trilogies.robphas wrote: The Dark Knight trilogy, on the other hand, was produced over a span of 8-9 years. Three stories written years apart. Three different kinds of movies: hero's journey, crime thriller, war film. So that makes it a much more impressive feat to maintain that consistent level of quality while tying them all together.
What he said.robphas wrote:I give the DK trilogy the edge because the LOTR trilogy was based on one story that happened to be split into three books/parts. Not to mention the three films were all made at the same time. It's no surprise the three films kept the same look and feel throughout the trilogy. Of course it works as a trilogy, it's just one story adapted from a 3-part book and one kind of movie.Chris435 wrote:
ok, you don't even have to use LOTR. Star Wars is another example though. Star Wars has 2 movies comparable to Dark Knight. The Dark Knight trilogy has 2 movies (DKR & BB) that don't quite reach the heights of Star Wars IV: A New Hope. ROTJ is comparable to BB in terms of quality. So I got Star Wars as a better trilogy. Its got more classics.
IMO, LOTR has 3 movies which rival any SW movies. However, if you want to be strict, it has 2 movies (Fellowship & ROTK) that are comparable to Star Wars 2 biggies. Two Towers blows out ROTJ though.
The Dark Knight trilogy, on the other hand, was produced over a span of 8-9 years. Three stories written years apart. Three different kinds of movies: hero's journey, crime thriller, war film. So that makes it a much more impressive feat to maintain that consistent level of quality while tying them all together.
And regarding BB and TDKR not being on the level of Star Wars: A New Hope, I just don't agree.
Posts: 211
Joined:
May 2012
i guess we're all set to agree and disagree.
The Dark Knight Saga is better than The Original Star Wars Trilogy or The Lord of the Rings, imo.
Un lladre es un artista. Fa servir la imaginació per lluirse cuan roba el seu trofeu. Els detectius només analitzen el delicte i ens denuncien. Els detectius son uns simples critics.
