Directors cut?

The 2012 superhero epic about Batman's struggle to overcome the terrorist leader Bane, as well as his own inner demons.
User avatar
Posts: 8282
Joined: May 2012
Location: The Island, NY
This masterpiece is already perfect but an extended cut would leave me speechless.

User avatar
Posts: 9849
Joined: October 2011
Location: Foot of Mt. Belzoni
Allstar wrote:Director cuts are for hacks.
Agreed.
Ah, böwakawa! Poussé, poussé...
Ah, böwakawa! Poussé, poussé...
Ah, böwakawa! Poussé, poussé...

User avatar
Posts: 21411
Joined: June 2010
Location: All-Hail Master Virgo, Censor of NolanFans
This is the first Nolan film for which I would like to see a Director's Cut.

User avatar
Posts: 1161
Joined: February 2012
Location: Oregon, USA
Director's cuts are not for hacks, especially in the case of studio interference.

Posts: 7738
Joined: February 2012
Location: Boston, Taxachusetts.
ArmandFancypants wrote:
Allstar wrote:Director cuts are for hacks.
Agreed.
That's such generalizing. I cannot take that statement seriously. Sure, if everyone of your films needs fucking Directors Cut than you have an issue, but to think that there is absolutely no use or place for them at all is ridiculous. Nolan isn't immune to studio interference. The first cut he showed, as I have said, was slightly over 3 hrs. I don't think any Nolan film before has ever had that much cut from it. Usually there's like 2 deleted scenes at the most. It isn't crazy to think, especially considering how ambitious this story is, that Nolan might have been told to cut some parts. It certainly feels that way to me and I have never felt that way about any previous Nolan film.

Posts: 140
Joined: July 2012
It deserves a longer version if you wanna go deep into details and take your time to watch and enjoy it.
It doesn't need it. Because it has the pace to keep the audience in the movie when you attend the cinema.

As said before, Nolan had never made a an extented version of his previous movies.

but the difference is that, on his previous movies, Nolan only shoot what you can see in the final cut. For TDKR, I'm not sure about that. Rumours about Raw cut (all the rushes stick together chronologically) of 4 hours. Pre-screenings of 3 hours. Let's not forget about the 2h45-Imax limitation. Also, Nolan spend more than a year to plan and shoot it.

TDKR is such a great movie. An outstanding achievement. And I consider TDKR as equal to BB and TDK. TDKR can top the whole thing if there is, outside in this cruel world, a 3 hours long version of this movie that WB want to release.

But hey before that, WB, have to sell normal blu-ray, trilogy blu-ray and SUPER trilogy blu-ray. See if, TDKR is on a Oscar-shot. To sum up the whole thing, we'll probably have to wait 10years! :lol:


i'd like to see more of:
Tate/Wayne.
Wayne-Batman/Kyle.
Kyle/Tate.
Bane/Tate.
Bane/Kyle.
More of the revolution and how the people endured it.
More jail time for Wayne and how he endured it
More of the war/guerilla scene.
Extented last fight (but still with Catwoman kickin' Bane's ass!)
Last edited by Zimmeredge on July 24th, 2012, 7:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Posts: 12
Joined: March 2012
Sometimes a) studio execs meddle with the film or b) put pressure for a shorter cut. Sometimes c) even the director himself might feel that a shorter cut is "necessary".

I personally feel the theatrical cut of TDKR is a combo of b) and c).

A director's cut is highly unlikely (given Nolan's track record of not having director's cuts / extended editions), but TDKR would benefit the most of it out of possibly all of Nolan's films.

Posts: 12
Joined: March 2012
...and of course the IMAX run time limitation was a factor. Damn you, IMAX? ;)

User avatar
Posts: 8049
Joined: October 2011
Location: Chungking Mansions
I would prefer a director's cut of this film.
Do you... like pineapple?

Posts: 6803
Joined: May 2011
Saw it again today. Everything flowed fine this time around. No need for it.

Post Reply