lol.Allstar wrote:and if someone gave that a reason how exactly is that a problem? I guess you don't have respect for the character and Heath's performance if you get annoyed by that.Based4Life wrote: He didn't mention the Joker.
I've just seen TDKR.... (no spoilers on view)
Posts: 196
Joined:
May 2012
Why do you say don't mention The Joker? Do you not agree a brilliant character and performance could possibly make one film better than another if it is a close call?Based4Life wrote:Kidding right?Allstar wrote: and if someone gave that a reason how exactly is that a problem? I guess you don't have respect for the character and Heath's performance if you get annoyed by that.
Posts: 24
Joined:
June 2012
id go 9/10 on first viewing, i preferred it to previous two on first viewing. must see again, can't wait.Red Hood wrote:What would you rate it, on a scale of 1 to 10?LetTheGamesBegin wrote:Just back from a screening at IMAX in Southampton, UK. Was a general public screening, no critics, well not that I know of.
Outstanding film, for fans who've waited, like I have, it's worth the wait. Bane is a monster, absolutely terrifying villain. Anne Hathaway is fantastic. Bale great as per. Great ending, just a supremely epic film, nothing I've seen as of late comes close. It's almost too much to take in, so glad seeing again in 2 days.
Would you say you liked it better than Begins?darthnazgul wrote:I have two main complaints but I can't discuss them without spoiling. And I'm on my iPod so I can't type too much. Let's just say that in terms of flaws TDK had less and frankly Nolan could have done a bit better but Rise was incredibly emotional. Including a moment that will go down as one of the most inspirational in the history of film. I'm talking Shawshank Redemption level of emotions.Based4Life wrote: What do you mean not as good? In what ways? Dont you dare mention the Joker...
Posts: 24
Joined:
June 2012
Bane is incomparible to Joker, there just different, both excellent in there own way.Red Hood wrote:Or the length...Based4Life wrote: What do you mean not as good? In what ways? Dont you dare mention the Joker...
never has a near 3 hr film flown by so fast.
Posts: 24
Joined:
June 2012
Yes, the final scene was perfect way to finish trilogy.NotWearingHockeyPads wrote:I've heard mixed things on a rumored final scene. Did you like it?LetTheGamesBegin wrote:Just back from a screening at IMAX in Southampton, UK. Was a general public screening, no critics, well not that I know of.
Outstanding film, for fans who've waited, like I have, it's worth the wait. Bane is a monster, absolutely terrifying villain. Anne Hathaway is fantastic. Bale great as per. Great ending, just a supremely epic film, nothing I've seen as of late comes close. It's almost too much to take in, so glad seeing again in 2 days.
Posts: 24
Joined:
June 2012
Its a small part, a fun one, but small.BlairCo wrote:How big is Juno Temple's role, exactly?
same people who complain about mentioning the joker, are the same people who were saying Bane will be better than Joker every time a new spot or trailer came out. Ledger was a huge part of TDK being great, and his performance can be a deciding factor of which one is better. There is a number of other factors, but I don't think its stupid to say that would have an impact.YourLiberation123 wrote:lol.Allstar wrote: and if someone gave that a reason how exactly is that a problem? I guess you don't have respect for the character and Heath's performance if you get annoyed by that.
Last edited by Durden on July 18th, 2012, 6:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Yeah she's in the film for like 5 minutes, topsLetTheGamesBegin wrote:Its a small part, a fun one, but small.BlairCo wrote:How big is Juno Temple's role, exactly?
Posts: 24
Joined:
June 2012
slightly more air time than those rolesRed Hood wrote:I'm betting a very, very, small role like TDK's Bank Manager and the hobo with the coat in BB.BlairCo wrote:How big is Juno Temple's role, exactly?