Starting this thread for the sole sake of thanking Wally Pfister for refusing to shoot films in 3D or with digital cameras.
THANK YOU!!!
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
THANK YOU!!!
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
![Clap :clap:](./images/smilies/icon_clap.gif)
What's wrong with digital cameras?MW715 wrote:Starting this thread for the sole sake of thanking Wally Pfister for refusing to shoot films in 3D or with digital cameras.
THANK YOU!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
MW715 wrote:Starting this thread for the sole sake of thanking Wally Pfister for refusing to shoot films in 3D or with digital cameras.
THANK YOU!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think digitally shot films look like crap. They either look like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries in my opinion. Sure film's expensive and a pain to work with, but it adds such atmosphere to the frame and looks so much better (in my opinion)Vader182 wrote: What's wrong with digital cameras?
-Vader
You think The Social Network looks like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries?MW715 wrote:I think digitally shot films look like crap. They either look like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries in my opinion. Sure film's expensive and a pain to work with, but it adds such atmosphere to the frame and looks so much better (in my opinion)Vader182 wrote: What's wrong with digital cameras?
-Vader
...I hated that movie... so don't get me started...Vader182 wrote:You think The Social Network looks like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries?MW715 wrote: I think digitally shot films look like crap. They either look like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries in my opinion. Sure film's expensive and a pain to work with, but it adds such atmosphere to the frame and looks so much better (in my opinion)
Right.
-Vader