(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA

Wally Pfister and Hoyte van Hoytema
User avatar
Posts: 3588
Joined: June 2010
Location: Secret Canadian Bunker

Posts: 18329
Joined: February 2011
Awesome stuff, thanks for the post!

User avatar
Posts: 20188
Joined: June 2010
Location: The White City
That was really fantastic. Usually learn at least a few things you hadn't before with each of these Wally interviews.

Posts: 2224
Joined: July 2010
Shame Wally had that experience with the Phantom. Certainly seems to be basing most of his opinions on that experience, read another brief thing about him in Kodak mag. Tsk tsk. Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!

User avatar
Posts: 43129
Joined: May 2010
RomanM wrote:Shame Wally had that experience with the Phantom. Certainly seems to be basing most of his opinions on that experience, read another brief thing about him in Kodak mag. Tsk tsk. Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!
But Wally is better then Deakins.

Posts: 2224
Joined: July 2010
allstarr55js wrote:
RomanM wrote:Shame Wally had that experience with the Phantom. Certainly seems to be basing most of his opinions on that experience, read another brief thing about him in Kodak mag. Tsk tsk. Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!
But Wally is better then Deakins.
LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AHHHH!!! LMAOOO! Thanks for the laugh kiddo!

User avatar
Posts: 13944
Joined: June 2009
Location: La La Land
But Wally is better then Deakins.
First off, I disagree. Secondly, what the hell does that have to do with anything?
Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!
:problem:

Why? For better low light or... why would you want him to use the ALEXA?

Posts: 2224
Joined: July 2010
Crazy Eight wrote:
But Wally is better then Deakins.
First off, I disagree. Secondly, what the hell does that have to do with anything?
Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!
:problem:

Why? For better low light or... why would you want him to use the ALEXA?
Because the Phantom is not the camera to use to judge digital cinematography against? LOL come on Crazy.

User avatar
Posts: 43129
Joined: May 2010
LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AHHHH!!! LMAOOO! Thanks for the laugh kiddo!
It is not that funny. Wally has this Deakins does not.
Image
First off, I disagree.
Of course you do.

User avatar
Posts: 13944
Joined: June 2009
Location: La La Land
It is not that funny. Wally has this Deakins does not.
Image
:facepalm:

When did you start sucking the Academy's dick? Deakin's had 9 nomination by the way, including two in the same year. He's been robbed so many times...
Because the Phantom is not the camera to use to judge digital cinematography against? LOL come on Crazy.
My bad. I thought you were suggesting he should replace his Anamorphic 35mm get up for the ALEXA.

Post Reply