Pratham wrote:

Cilogy wrote:Bacon I love you bro

am i a good president or am i a trump (an idiot elected to office)

TehBatGetsBraked wrote:am i a good president or am i a trump (an idiot elected to office)

Stock market at an all time high. Unemployment at a 16 year low.

Dude must be doing something right

Dodd wrote:

TehBatGetsBraked wrote:am i a good president or am i a trump (an idiot elected to office)

Stock market at an all time high. Unemployment at a 16 year low.

Dude must be doing something right

Bloomberg would be doing better doe

wat

Dodd wrote:

TehBatGetsBraked wrote:am i a good president or am i a trump (an idiot elected to office)

Stock market at an all time high. Unemployment at a 16 year low.

Dude must be doing something right

Bloomberg would be doing better doe

If unemployment is so low, then why am I still unemployed?

Dodd wrote:

TehBatGetsBraked wrote:am i a good president or am i a trump (an idiot elected to office)

Stock market at an all time high. Unemployment at a 16 year low.

Dude must be doing something right

Bloomberg would be doing better doe

like taking 17 day golf vacations and colluding with hostile foreign nations

Dodd wrote:

TehBatGetsBraked wrote:am i a good president or am i a trump (an idiot elected to office)

Stock market at an all time high. Unemployment at a 16 year low.

Dude must be doing something right

Bloomberg would be doing better doe

Show me one bit of legislation, that is remotely original, introduced into congress by your fellow inheritance queen that can allow us to give him some credit for this "success". When a rightwing rag like Forbes is forced to give an almost half way honest explanation to something so obvious you know you don't have a intellectual/moral leg to stand on with this supply side economics nonsense (https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/ ... e84795128a). An honest person would expect the same thing from your hero Bloomberg who's right-"libertarian" ideology argues that sweatshop laborers are free since they chose to be wageslaves rather than experience complete starvation on the streets while parasites on the Fortune 500 list are oppressed because they pay their taxes, the source of all of their subsidies.

Also, where are the Free Speech Champions on the Right opposing US legislation that hinders free speech? They all cried about inconsequential shit going on at college campuses and that shill Trudeau introducing nonsense legislation in Canada but they don't seem to care about legislation in their own country that'll put you in prison for 20 years for supporting boycotts on Israeli businesses (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... 3e9c65d2b6). What explanation is there for the majority of Senate Republicans supporting this bill other than the fact that these people are nothing more than pathetic servants to big business? (https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-con ... cosponsors). Why doesn't your hero would-be president use his influential newspaper to help crush this brazen attack on free market principles? The framing in this article (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... els-debate) is horrendous since any moron will immediately understand that boycotts are an exercise of freedom of expression yet your boy's paper tries to pass this off as an actual debate. Right-wing bootlickers argue that spending money is free speech but choosing to not spend your money isn't? More proof of their dishonest, incoherent, and servile character.

I look forward to your usual non-response.

This post was inspired by the fact that Cilogy didn't include me as being in prison ten years from now for my leftist shenanigans.

Be my VP fox?

TehBatGetsBraked wrote:Be my VP fox?