Page 314 of 1000

Controversial opinions about movies

Posted: January 4th, 2013, 12:58 am
by Dodd
BlairCo wrote:In Bruges > Tropic Thunder
+1

but...


Groundhog Day > In Bruges.


Even though I love In Bruges

Controversial opinions about movies

Posted: January 4th, 2013, 12:58 am
by RyanRises
BlairCo wrote:In Bruges > Tropic Thunder
:problem:

Controversial opinions about movies

Posted: January 4th, 2013, 1:00 am
by BlairCo
RyanRises wrote:
BlairCo wrote:In Bruges > Tropic Thunder
:problem:
Image

Controversial opinions about movies

Posted: January 4th, 2013, 1:23 am
by Allstar
jibran wrote:
Cilogy wrote:Les Mis trailer > Les Mis
This is probably true. I didn't even like the trailer that much.
:lol:

Controversial opinions about movies

Posted: January 4th, 2013, 2:12 am
by gaspernoe
The Tree of Life is pretty to look at but is also a pretentious borefest.

Controversial opinions about movies

Posted: January 4th, 2013, 2:21 am
by Cop 223
gaspernoe wrote:The Tree of Life is pretty to look at but is also a pretentious borefest.
You're going to become very popular very soon.


I found it quite enthralling. It was an incredibly memorable cinema experience for me. It's not a movie that I would watch again frequently but it definitely was fascinating and affecting. What Malick really needs for his later films to succeed is to be locked out of the editing room. The way he writes and films already allows for a free flowing narrative structure but someone with tighter editing skills could really help tie it all together.

For Malick, I highly recommend hiring Leslie Jones again.

Controversial opinions about movies

Posted: January 4th, 2013, 2:28 am
by IWatchFilmsNotMovies
gaspernoe wrote:The Tree of Life is pretty to look at but is also a pretentious borefest.
qft

Controversial opinions about movies

Posted: January 4th, 2013, 2:40 am
by gaspernoe
jibran wrote:
gaspernoe wrote:The Tree of Life is pretty to look at but is also a pretentious borefest.
You're going to become very popular very soon.


I found it quite enthralling. It was an incredibly memorable cinema experience for me. It's not a movie that I would watch again frequently but it definitely was fascinating and affecting. What Malick really needs for his later films to succeed is to be locked out of the editing room. The way he writes and films already allows for a free flowing narrative structure but someone with tighter editing skills could really help tie it all together.

For Malick, I highly recommend hiring Leslie Jones again.
I respect Terrence Malick as a director, his earlier work such as The Thin Red Line and Badlands are out of this world. His later work on The New World and The Tree of Life are tough to watch, especially the latter movie. This is the movie where I really lost it as it was a movie I wanted to love. The Tree of Life contains what I like about Malick but also what I dislike but cranked up to 10. It's infuriating to watch yet I can't deny that it's well shot and put together.

Controversial opinions about movies

Posted: January 4th, 2013, 2:41 am
by BlairCo
gaspernoe wrote:The Tree of Life is pretty to look at but is also a pretentious borefest.
This is how I feel about Malick; he's a tremendous artist, but he's very pretentious when it comes to the narrative.


Controversial opinions about movies

Posted: January 4th, 2013, 2:44 am
by Cilogy
BlairCo wrote:
gaspernoe wrote:The Tree of Life is pretty to look at but is also a pretentious borefest.
This is how I feel about Malick; he's a tremendous artist, but he's very pretentious when it comes to the narrative.

I don't think he's pretentious, at least not intentionally. I think he's just in love with the visual aspect of film and believes that the narrative will be driven by that. That works sometimes, but not all the time.