Oh right, my bad. It's still amusing though.m4st4 wrote:Solid Snake and Alex Tse wrote that ending, not Zack Snyder.
Lol at calling him Solid Snake.
Oh right, my bad. It's still amusing though.m4st4 wrote:Solid Snake and Alex Tse wrote that ending, not Zack Snyder.
I'm not quite sure if I did. But my problems with the film do not lie within its ambiguity, or at least I don't think they do since I've been told over and over again that it's a film that can enjoyed without fully understanding it. But It's just rather that I found the film to incoherent and messy, like Kubrick was trying so hard to create something unique, artistic and different that it never really comes together as a coherent whole. I thought it was poorly paced and filled with extremely long winded shots of space in which while they look pretty, felt unnecessary at times. None of the characters are memorable aside from HAL 9000 and I did find the ending to be rather silly. So perhaps in regards to the ending, I may need more time to fully evaluate it.neb4ever wrote:Did you understand it?TomsWindow wrote:I didn't like 2001: A Space Odyssey
slimshady247 wrote:And wait, how is it that
There's a dedicated thread for SW.NapoleonSolo wrote:A New Hope is better than Empire .
Same.TehBatGetsBraked wrote:I don't disown Kingdom of the Crystal Skull from the Indiana jones franchise
It has some redeeming qualities that I really like
It's not even close to Raiders or Crusade but i don't hate it nonetheless
Thank's for telling me and Nice Avy .m4st4 wrote:There's a dedicated thread for SW.NapoleonSolo wrote:A New Hope is better than Empire .
Sean Connery suggests otherwise.Sky007 wrote:Temple of Doom is better than Last Crusade