Discussion forums for the premiere fan community for and by fans of film director Christopher Nolan.
https://www.nolanfans.com/forums/
You are completely over simplifying the performance.Vader182 wrote:How is that a cheap comment? He did. He played the character in the film identically to how he's played most of his characters, drunken whilst angry, drunken for comedic effect, moments of kind of wisdom, funny, some moments of emotion, etc.
-Vader
But you don't.IWatchFilmsNotMovies wrote:-IWatchFilms
Oh, okay. I didn't know, sorry.IWatchFilmsNotMovies wrote:You are completely over simplifying the performance.Vader182 wrote:How is that a cheap comment? He did. He played the character in the film identically to how he's played most of his characters, drunken whilst angry, drunken for comedic effect, moments of kind of wisdom, funny, some moments of emotion, etc.
-Vader
-IWatchFilms
Try looking at the performance more closely next time you watch it. Look for the little gestures, hand movements, etc. You should be able to catch it on your second viewing.Vader182 wrote:Oh, okay. I didn't know, sorry.
-Vader
Um...I disagree with a lot of it and agree with a little of itVader182 wrote:Do you have any comments on anything I posted, though? I'm getting the feeling a lot of people liked the idea of the movie a lot more than the movie itself, which is how most people view a lot of stuff myself included.
-Vader
I'm still not sure if it's used in jest by everyone except Talli.solo2001 wrote:I can't even tell when people are being sarcastic anymore.IWatchFilmsNotMovies wrote:LOL @ Woody playing himself. Vader clearly missed the internal transformation.
