Biribiri wrote:Unfortunately it is very easy to destroy reputations by picking anything isolated and out of context. The same happened to pewdiepieakv1984 wrote:Is Milo the pedophile dude?Biribiri wrote:Still waiting for Milo's Dangerous as the SWJs tremble fear and hide in their safe spaces.
What's the last book you've read?
Posts: 8437
Joined:
August 2012
Good job at not answering the question. And people on this forum actually defended pewdiepie and we all felt sorry for him.Biribiri wrote:Unfortunately it is very easy to destroy reputations by picking anything isolated and out of context. The same happened to pewdiepieakv1984 wrote:Is Milo the pedophile dude?Biribiri wrote:Still waiting for Milo's Dangerous as the SWJs tremble fear and hide in their safe spaces.
Milo's views actually sound worse in context.Biribiri wrote:Unfortunately it is very easy to destroy reputations by picking anything isolated and out of context. The same happened to pewdiepieakv1984 wrote:Is Milo the pedophile dude?Biribiri wrote:Still waiting for Milo's Dangerous as the SWJs tremble fear and hide in their safe spaces.
milo actually says a lot of true stuff, but he also says so much disgusting and horrid stuff that we obviously pick out the latter when talking about him
I also think a lot of his true stuff gets muddled with his overly biased articles and poor reporting/journalism skills.Michaelf2225 wrote:milo actually says a lot of true stuff, but he also says so much disgusting and horrid stuff that we obviously pick out the latter when talking about him
This isn't the type of dude conservatives need representing them.
100% agreeakv1984 wrote:I also think a lot of his true stuff gets muddled with his overly biased articles and poor reporting/journalism skills.Michaelf2225 wrote:milo actually says a lot of true stuff, but he also says so much disgusting and horrid stuff that we obviously pick out the latter when talking about him
This isn't the type of dude conservatives need representing them.
but while i think he's a bad representation of the average conservative ideals, i'm okay with him as a provocateur, because i think some of the provocative stuff he says has - at least in some part - sparked genuine conversation about real issues: Islam, feminism, etc.
if that makes sense
I know what you mean. I don't really have a problem with Milo being a troll. As a troll, he did elicit conversation. I just don't like him being a troll and trying to have some semblance of a career in journalism. He's not a good writer and he isn't nearly intelligent enough to be a journalist. So that's why his articles come off as being some angry teenage boy's opinion pieces he put up on FB.Michaelf2225 wrote:100% agreeakv1984 wrote:I also think a lot of his true stuff gets muddled with his overly biased articles and poor reporting/journalism skills.Michaelf2225 wrote:milo actually says a lot of true stuff, but he also says so much disgusting and horrid stuff that we obviously pick out the latter when talking about him
This isn't the type of dude conservatives need representing them.
but while i think he's a bad representation of the average conservative ideals, i'm okay with him as a provocateur, because i think some of the provocative stuff he says has - at least in some part - sparked genuine conversation about real issues: Islam, feminism, etc.
if that makes sense
If Milo was just some dude making dumb twitter statuses and posting memes on Facebook like Amiri King, no one would have a huge issue with him and fights at Berkley wouldn't have happened etc.
Page turner
Yeah, last summer. Elon is a G