X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014)

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
Posts: 55632
Joined: May 2010
DoubleD wrote:You see. The thing is. It sits on the shelf sideways. So I don't ever see it.
I KNEW IT. :D

User avatar
Posts: 5434
Joined: June 2012
Location: Free
The theatrical cut was better. It made the (in retrospective, very wise) decision to focus primarily on Charles's story and the character's in the past, which made for a much stronger narrative, in my opinion. Perhaps it's because I saw the theatrical version first but the problem with the new scenes is that they, with the exception of perhaps a new scene with Mystique and Beast, interrupt the story without adding anything really interesting or memorable, and thus feel like filler in the middle of the movie.

User avatar
Posts: 13146
Joined: February 2011
It was still cool to see more from McKelleneto.£

User avatar
Posts: 17502
Joined: May 2011
It’s no secret that James Cameron’s The Terminator has been a highly influential film across all media, but the fan-favorite film was pre-dated by a similar story in the 1980s, the X-Men comic book storyline titled “Days of Future Past.”

Naturally when the story was finally adapted to film, director Bryan Singer and screenwriter/producer Simon Kinberg approached Cameron about their ideas, specifically the science of their time travel. The pair even mentioned this to us when we visited the set of the film in 2013, but James Cameron helped out the production in another way.

While on the set of X-Men: Apocalypse, Singer told us how James Cameron helped shape the final scene of “Days of Future Past,” which almost had a different tone to its happy ending.

“Originally my editor was obsessed with this visual blurriness,” Singer revealed. “So when Wolverine is walking around he’s seeing things in kind of a blurriness. So I sent that to Jim and Jim called me up and goes ‘Bryan, that blurry thing made me think that the wool was going to be pulled out from under me and I was not satisfied. I thought it was going to be a lie and it had failed and it would all be dark, and then suddenly it was okay.’ It was the only note Jim gave me. He said ‘Oh I love the movie, it’s going to be great,’ but he said ‘Let the audience enjoy the fact that it all turned out okay… in that future.’” So I pulled the effect off and my editor was like ‘Oh I like it, it’s so cool and weird!’ and I’m like ‘Shut up, it’s coming off!’”

As a post script to the story, Singer revealed the version he sent to Cameron didn’t include the cameos of the original cast members that we saw in the final threatrical version.

“I explained that to Jim and I said ‘By the way, it didnt have these three cameos’ and he goes “OH Why didn’t you tell me that? That makes a big difference dude in letting me enjoy the ending of the g***amn f***ing movie!’ and I’m like ‘Sorry, I’m keeping that so secret I didn’t even want to let that go to New Zealand.’”

User avatar
Posts: 5219
Joined: January 2012
DoubleD wrote:
It’s no secret that James Cameron’s The Terminator has been a highly influential film across all media, but the fan-favorite film was pre-dated by a similar story in the 1980s, the X-Men comic book storyline titled “Days of Future Past.”

Naturally when the story was finally adapted to film, director Bryan Singer and screenwriter/producer Simon Kinberg approached Cameron about their ideas, specifically the science of their time travel. The pair even mentioned this to us when we visited the set of the film in 2013, but James Cameron helped out the production in another way.

While on the set of X-Men: Apocalypse, Singer told us how James Cameron helped shape the final scene of “Days of Future Past,” which almost had a different tone to its happy ending.

“Originally my editor was obsessed with this visual blurriness,” Singer revealed. “So when Wolverine is walking around he’s seeing things in kind of a blurriness. So I sent that to Jim and Jim called me up and goes ‘Bryan, that blurry thing made me think that the wool was going to be pulled out from under me and I was not satisfied. I thought it was going to be a lie and it had failed and it would all be dark, and then suddenly it was okay.’ It was the only note Jim gave me. He said ‘Oh I love the movie, it’s going to be great,’ but he said ‘Let the audience enjoy the fact that it all turned out okay… in that future.’” So I pulled the effect off and my editor was like ‘Oh I like it, it’s so cool and weird!’ and I’m like ‘Shut up, it’s coming off!’”

As a post script to the story, Singer revealed the version he sent to Cameron didn’t include the cameos of the original cast members that we saw in the final threatrical version.

“I explained that to Jim and I said ‘By the way, it didnt have these three cameos’ and he goes “OH Why didn’t you tell me that? That makes a big difference dude in letting me enjoy the ending of the g***amn f***ing movie!’ and I’m like ‘Sorry, I’m keeping that so secret I didn’t even want to let that go to New Zealand.’”
Days of Future Past is the best Terminator sequel we're ever gonna get.

User avatar
Posts: 42894
Joined: May 2010
Looper still the best recent time travel flick and will probably remain the best for a while.

User avatar
Posts: 13914
Joined: May 2010
Location: Mumbai
That's a funny way of writing Edge of Tomorrow.

User avatar
Posts: 13146
Joined: February 2011
Now Where Was I ? wrote:Days of Future Past is the best Terminator sequel we're ever gonna get.
I'd say that Looper was better but that's just me.£

Posts: 55632
Joined: May 2010
None are Groundhog Day though.

User avatar
Posts: 19093
Joined: June 2012
Location: stuck in 2020
Pratham wrote:That's a funny way of writing Edge of Tomorrow.
lol true

Post Reply